hyena said:Right, this needs a response, and a question. The response: I know that I'm not the ultimate philosopher that mankind has produced, therefore I do not take exception to this definition. Personally, I think I'm better than the average (not confined to this forum) where structured thoughts are concerned, while I might not excel in elegance on here because English is not my first language. But that's an opinion, and you're free to disagree. For once, I'm not even offended by your post.
On the other hand, please mention people (on here) that you regard as capable of good conversation according to the definition I gave. In order to clarify, I'm thinking of: non-superficial reflection, original ideas, pleasant and inspiring form, knowledge of the topic that's being debated, openness and receptiveness towards counter-arguments. I'm curious as to whom you would put on the white list.
A) If i had to choose anyone who would have tried to convert this into a popularity contest it would be both of you, so congratulations on meeting my increasingly low expectations of both of you as worthless fucking broads.
B) Its ridiculous that you think that i would ever want anyone here to regard me as anything other than a troll, given the fact that i constantly state how i dont give a shit about anyone here.
C) If anything is more absurd than the above two, is the fact that you think pleasant and ispiring ideas are somehow more valid. Again leave it to a dumb fucking broad to asume something more beautifull is better and more valid.