I agree, I was debating putting either them or another band on my list, but I went with them.I think i took them out and put Carcass in instead. Cant believe Carcass isnt already in.
I agree, I was debating putting either them or another band on my list, but I went with them.I think i took them out and put Carcass in instead. Cant believe Carcass isnt already in.
And yet another caper is put to rest, tell me, how do you do it Mr. Holmes?
So you're not Omni ready to check out at any given moment? Drat, I thought I had 'em.I use my brain, mine isn't expired yet.
So you're not Omni ready to check out at any given moment? Drat, I thought I had 'em.
I was one time over 30 years ago, haven't had a drop since.Are you also drunk?
Yeah, I'm a teetotaler, so I guess you could say I have no excuse.Oh yeah that's right.
Yeah, I'm a teetotaler, so I guess you could say I have no excuse.
I'm an agnostic atheist, so no. It's simply a personal choice.Are you a teetotaller for religious reasons?
I'm an agnostic atheist, so no. It's simply a personal choice.
No, it just means I don't personally believe in God, but I'm not gnostic about my position, in other words I acknowledge I can't disprove a negative, and thus make no definitive claims either way. In other words, I'm cognizant that I very well could be wrong, and make sure to let that be known. Whereas a gnostic atheist would claim they know there is no God.Oh okay, fair enough. Also isn't that an oxymoron? Agnosticism is the idea that nothing is known or can be known about God and isn't that what atheism means except with the addition of disbelief?
Sadly, I've met gnostic atheists. A rarer breed, but a present one nonetheless.I've never met a gnostic atheist, seems like a pretty pointless distinction to make to me, since an inability to ever be certain is implied within the term atheism.
Hitchens fleshed this out years ago I thought.
They tend to be of that persuasion, yes. The ones that claim "THERE IS NO GOD!" and shit like that. Some of the most fantastically absurd and nauseating human beings to walk the Earth. The ones that jerk themselves raw to the fact that they're atheists every waking moment and make absolute claims of disbelief in God. That not only do they disbelieve in deities, but they claim definitively that they don't exist.I guess that's what a "militant atheist" would technically be. They're fucking insufferable.
They tend to be of that persuasion, yes. The ones that claim "THERE IS NO GOD!" and shit like that. Some of the most fantastically absurd and nauseating human beings to walk the Earth. The ones that jerk themselves raw to the fact that they're atheists every waking moment and make absolute claims of disbelief in God. That not only do they disbelieve in deities, but they claim definitively that they don't exist.
Whatever, therefore, our concept of an object may contain, we must always step outside it, in order to attribute to it existence. With objects of the senses, this takes place through their connection with any one of my perceptions, according to empirical laws; with objects of pure thought, however, there is no means of knowing their existence, because it would have to be known entirely a priori, while our consciousness of every kind of existence, whether immediately by perception, or by conclusions which connect something with perception, belongs entirely to the unity of experience, and any existence outside that field, though it cannot be declared to be absolutely impossible, is a presupposition that cannot be justified by anything.