VCC 2.0

derekmoffat

608 STUDIOS
Dec 4, 2009
228
0
16
Milwaukee, WI
www.myspace.com
BjFu_QhOT-jezc39DDtIMzVsAKntPA0UP_G3SzxLrdgWLERo8zrdUyhCahqJcCiHNvYPp7r6TojP_Wo3vW_Uv21KEZxQGS_X7kE3yqCe7CsGdBIyFljNdH-HEezD8qU2y9nX_TAAgZMbKafstkefi3_Bdq27UvhLQsQ3UfzqvqaBIfRvXx42udwKerggXrGe=s0-d-e1-ft



"Dear VCC Customer,

Welcome to your sneak peak at the Virtual Console Collection 2.0, which will be available as a FREE update soon. Let me tell you about what's new!

The 'Brit 4k' is a model of a late 80's British mixing console. It's been a customer favorite and is perfect for adding that little bit of extra glue, punch, and width to the DAW's digital mixer. Well, after we released VCC back in 2010, we started to hear rumors around Los Angeles of a small early 80's "E" series British Console that was supposedly the most amazing sounding mixing desk in town. After some research and some good tips from a few friends, we found this famous little desk and I ran about five mixes through it and compared it to the DAW summed mixes. Wow is all I can say. This desk was incredible. It has a beautiful low end punch, but also really brought the lows together with a very unique glue. The low mids became thicker without sounding muddy. The midrange was more pronounced and transients were clearer and more articulate. Everything in the mix had more of its own space. The width increased and the mix became more exciting. And you can push into the mixbuss to get a beautiful aggression. So this is the new model on the VCC 2.0, called the 'Brit 4k E'! I can't wait for you all to experience it. Overall, it's got a bit more color and vibe than the current Brit 4k, but it is not as overwhelmingly colorful as some of the other models like the Brit N. I think you guys are going to love it. It's become my new go-to VCC model on my mixes.

Next, you'll notice that the GUI's have changed quite a lot! Everything is now available on the front panel. There are no submenus, and the grouping system is much easier and straightforward. You have an input and output trim, and a link switch. By pushing the input and attenuating the output, you'll achieve new types of saturation sounds that will have a different effect than the DRIVE parameter. Now, about that DRIVE parameter, it actually has an increased range so you can get even more color if you so desire!

Your'e going to notice a difference in the US-A Discrete model too. A friend wrote me saying "I have the hardware console and yours matches almost perfectly, except mine has a slightly bigger bottom". So we analyzed this particular desk and I really did like how the bottom was slightly thicker and a tad punchier, so after some thorough testing, we updated our US-A Discrete Algo and I think you'll really enjoy the result. It's a fairly subtle change, but one that I believe is for the better.

The RC-Tube has always been one of my favorite emulations and I use it on a lot of individual tracks for the unique effect that it creates. However, the condition of the original hardware reference, the RCA BC6B, was in fairly poor condition. Well, since the RC-Tube was first released, we were able to examine a mint condition unit, and I thought it had some subtle discrepancies which I really liked. So we applied some of these updates to the RC-Tube model, and you'll notice that it has a slightly warmer and richer low mid and low end. You're gonna love what it does to vocals, bass, and even on the mixbuss.

Because the VCC has been completely rewritten in our new framework, you're gonna see some serious reduction in CPU! While I can't give exact numbers yet, it's pretty significant! You'll also notice that we have a noise reduction button right on the front panel.

In conclusion, we're fixing last minute bugs so we can get this into beta, and then into your studios. Thanks so much for the patience and support. We've learned a lot over the past few years and I will always aim to improve, and you'll see a lot of those improvements executed in 2015. Happy Mixing! And please say hi to me at NAMM 2015, booth 6921!

Cheers,
Steven Slate"

MUCHHH BETTER imo. Curious to hear that Brit 4k E!
 
As excited as I am for this, the more e-mails I receive from Steven Slate the more convinced I am that every time he describes one of his products, he's limited to a word bank that includes "punch," "width," "warmth," "clarity," and "glue." :lol:

That said, this looks killer and it seems much improved from the current version in terms of being able to access all the features in a logical way.
 
Ahh, VMR. Never thought we'd see 500-series in the box, but here it is.

Really excited for this. I've been a big VCC user for years, and the new model along with the dropped oversampling options are exciting. Oversampling used to drive me insane, with the subtle changes it made to the mix. I could never decide which option to roll with.
 
^ as I understand it, the calibration was nothing else than the mirror equivalent of a trim plugin, with the input/output you should get rid of the problem !

I am super excited about it. I am curious about the special SSL model as well, although I might have preferred a Neve as I am always wondering if I should go for the Neve or not on tracks that didn't go through any kind of real saturation yet !

The 500 format was expected, he is obviously designing his plugins to fit into VMR one after the other. I'm guessing VTM is gonna follow as well as FGX which is under heavy recoding to AAX and 64 bit format already !
 
If Slate offered a bypass option, this could double as the trim plug.

Keen to hear the new desk and the updated US-A. The current US-A is the best on drums, makes them punch harder......with more width, depth, clarity and glue....
 
Also you can say what you want about Slate controversial commercial practices, free major update is really nice.
 
Man this looks so good! More excited about 64 bit FG-X but also REALLY looking forward to this update... bring it on Slate!
 
i hope this update will work with VMR right away!

Yep:

Slate said:
"Hi folks. So the response to the Sneak "Peak" (did anyone get the pun?) at VCC 2.0 was overwhelmingly positive and it's brought a great sense of motivation to us as we prepare it for beta (and NAMM).
So there have been a few questions about VCC 2.0 that I want to address. Let's start.

Q: Will the VCC 2.0 be back compatible with old projects?
A: No, it will not. As I've said in many emails, the original VCC code was just pretty hopeless. It was written with complexities that made it hard to fix bugs, hard to add new consoles, and hard on the CPU. There was absolutely nothing we could do to save the backwards compatibility if you wanted new consoles (with more coming in the future), better features, cleaner, code, and less CPU. But fear not, your current VCC 1.x will not be affected. If you have old projects with those plugins in them, they will work as they do now.

Q: Will VCC 2.0 modules be standalone or modules for VMR?
A: Let me first start this by saying that the new VCC 2.0 workflow will be the EXACT SAME WORKFLOW as you have now if you choose it to be. But yes, the modules will work in the FREE Virtual Mix Rack. Now don't jump to conclusions, let me explain.
If you load VCC 2.0 in VMR and save it as default, you essentially have the SAME workflow as now. You go into your plugin list, you choose VMR, it loads instantly with VCC 2.0 on your screen, and you proceed in EXACTLY THE SAME WAY as you do now. No extra steps or problems, no monsters jumping out of the screen, all is the same, and you'll have some sweet analog console tone again! If your plan is to just use VCC (since you are under absolutely positively NO obligation to get any other VMR modules), then just pretend that it is now listed as 'VMR' in your plugin menu. That's it.
Now, if you DO have VMR modules, this is gonna be a huge advantage for you. For me, I have several preset "dream channels" saved that I can easily pull up on tracks. For instance, the new Brit 4k E to the FG-S EQ to the FG-401 Compressor followed by some polish from Revival Sonic Enhancer is my go to channel for close drum mics. Heavy guitars are now US-A Discrete to FG-N EQ to FG-S EQ to FG-401. The cool thing about having VCC on your monitor with the entire signal chain is that you can really adjust its settings and gain staging in a much more intuitive way with the rest of your channel processing. You can experiment with pushing the output harder into the EQ to get more input saturation from the transformer, etc.
But again, you don't want to get VMR modules, no problem. Save VCC as your default module so it always pops up when initiated, and you're all good.
So why did we do this? Do we secretly want to get you to buy new VMR modules? Well, of course we want you get VMR modules, because they're awesome and we love them. But no that's not the reason we did this. We made the VCC modules for the VMR platform because if we didn't, you WOULD NOT be using VCC 2.0 for another few months. I'll explain.
Pretend you just built a house. The house is all done, but it's empty. Let's imagine that this empty house is the VMR framework. So now let's imagine that the furniture that goes in the house is DSP code, like VCC modules. To make VCC 2.0 for VMR, we simply put the furniture in the house and spend a bit of time placing it just right. But to make VCC 2.0 standalone… we have to build another entire house! Yes we'd have to create another framework, put all our new framework code into it, put all our graphic and CPU optimization into it, put our grouping network into it, and then test it for a month or two to ensure it all works well, then get the VCC code in, test more, etc. It would have been a major delay. Whereas the VMR framework has already gone through this vigorous testing for almost a year and has proven to be extremely stable.
So I really hope that this explains the VCC 2.0 situation, and you find comfort in knowing that if you want nearly the exact same workflow as you have now, you can have it. And I hope you understand that these decisions were made so that we can provide this update to you faster, which was very important to us.
I look forward to seeing many of you at NAMM booth 6921 next week, and I once again thank for your support, patience, and understanding. I am grateful to have you in the Slate Digital family and promise to keep delivering great tools to help you make music.
Cheers,
Steven Slate
 
I have absolutely no problem with it being in VMR, if VMR still has the blurred out modules that you don't own when using VCC then this is a great way for Slate to bring attention to them and we get a free update, everybody wins.