@hyena: ok, the following post is obviously not by me, since its content is critic of your words.
i really wish you would stop this, you know. you do have a point when you speak and usually you can clarify it pretty well. but then there's that moment when you just lash out, and there's nothing much i can do except stare in despair.
so people feels offended when you call them dimwits. big deal. i bet you couldn't fathom beforehand? it's ok if
beforehand you were disillusioned and upset, but you can't expect people you labeled as stupid to rush to your aid. tolerance should work both ways, and if you treat someone badly you should expect them to be at least slightly unhappy. the
skills to get popular in this case were limited to you either biting your tongue before insulting everyone or to you refraining from being so senslessly hostile. i'm sure this applies to a lot of environments, although right now i would really really love to find one where
dimwits is considered good education and a ticket to fame.
the fact that people here don't amount to nothing is also badly inconsistent since you only confront people's achievements with what
you have or wish you had. i guess most of the users are fairly satisfied with their goals and achievements, or at least dissatisfied with them in a way that is fairly similar to your way of being dissatisfied with what you did not achieve yet.
i'm all for sticking to objective landmarks though, so let's say you've got a lot more than a lot of the regulars here have got: that's no reason to flaunt it, unless your sole purpose is make them feel even more offended. you also have a lot more achievements than i do, so you can count me in the number of those who really don't like to have your shit rubbed on their face, especially when you're resorting to this as a simple means to unleash some tension.
as for tyrannies, the only one around here is mine, and it is of course pretty mediocre as most tyrannies are. you're hypocritical when you use words such as "complicity". when i agree with you apparently i have good motives, but when |ngenius agrees with fathervic they're just backing each other up? as for siren, she didn't really say a lot, did she? that's another partner-in-crime just because she
agrees with someone? would she have been partnering our crime if she agreed with you, or me, or whatever?
i don't want to see anybody leave this board. there might be the occasional argument but it only grows bigger because of the writing, the not-evenly-shared use of language, and everyone's personal feelings getting in the way and cutting off a great deal of nuances. i ask you to do your part in putting into practice the same open-mindedness and tolerance i wanted the others to use towards you. if there's one dictating something that might be considered over-candied peace&love here that's me, not fathervic.
rahvin.
o almighty gods in heaven, this comes as a surprise. i think that in order to chase rahvin i could use better means, like, say, a phone call, a text message, or even a personal visit. these things never came with a shortage in our interaction, they've worked for nearly 10 years before the forum existed, and they'll keep on working when the forum will be no more.
