I apologize for bumping, but there are actually a wealth of excellent discussions going on in this thread.
I think it's very easy to discriminate against Jews and blacks if you're not Jewish or black. That way, you never feel the spiritual cleansing of Judaism or the benefits of programs such as affirmative action. The policy of weakening the strong instead of strengthening the weak in a time of dire need is not in the elast bit irrational. Legislated equality seems as if it the last resort to balance out a rapidly polarizing society. Someday, we'll be in a world of true racial harmony, but this just isn't the time.
First, you attack my circumstances, albeit indirectly. If I'm not black or jewish, my commentary on the issues of jewish values and affirmative action, is somehow rendered less true. **sigh, you know what this is.... If you guessed irrelevant assbabble, you win a prize to be determined at a later date.
I see the harmful impact of the two, which is all that matters.
Even a person such as yourself can see that balancing things out in this manner leads to widespread mediocrity and weakens the overall level of functioning. Society is polarizing, by the way, because people are inherently unequal.
The last sentence has no basis in reality.
I did mean that people are born with equal opportunity( that sounds retarded, but you know what I mean--right to live and all that stuff, etc.). It's okay if you disagree with that notion. I tend to be idealistic when it comes to human issues. I don't associate equality with interchangeability. If that was the definition of "equality" no one would be equal. Not even twins.
Precisely, equality does not exist. People must be treated in a manner that fits their capabilities.
By equality, I mean rights. And superiority is an illusion. Strengths and weaknesses are a part of every person, and balance out eventually in some cosmic manner.
As was probably inevitable, you resorted to a religious argument. That people are equal in "some cosmic sense." There is no evidence for this whatsoever in reality. All of the ways that humans use to try to reach objective reality point to inequality. Your "argument" is a metaphysical, meaningless crock of shit.
I'll only respect Demiurge's avatar if that is the true representation of his beliefs and ideals. I then applaud him for braving the criticism associated with such a symbol to hang his balls out there. If the avatar is a ploy to simply garner criticism and controversy as a means to suffice a gargantuan attention complex, I simply postulate that the balls I previously mentioned are, in reality, nonexistent. Attention whores suck. Although I abhor Nazism, I respect going against the grain if it's for a cause.
As for the best metal album, that revitalizes the argument about objectivity in music. Some aspects can be analyzed objectively. A Cmaj-chord is a Cmaj-chord. That will not change. However, whether the use of that chord made music better or worse is an observation rooted in opinion, not fact. Therefore, the best metal album cannot be determined. It is a matter of opinion. Regardless of how well an album fits a given "template" dictated by a metal 'elite,' it could still be utter shite.
In summation, I don't believe there is a single best metal album. There are loads of really good ones, and then there are my personal favorites.