Yeah pretty amazing, so much for the Copenhagen meeting .
i was speaking of cities! i don't like modern cities/architecture. i don't have any particular interest about seeing modern cities, like new york or all those cities with skyscrapers, towers and stuff. i know there's more than big new metropolis in the USA (but surely it's the first thing that comes to my mind when i think to your country) , some people are really fascinated by this kind of things..... but i'm not
regarding nature instead, US must be very beautiful.
Ah OK, tsk tsk I should start a discussion of why they U.S. keep calling themselves 'Americans', but oh well perhaps later.
OOOOOooo I see. Well, hmm. I've been to a lot of ugly large cities here (hello Dallas, Texas, the ugliest metropolis in the world) . Now, smaller cities, there's plenty of pretty ones. In fact, the one I live in, Ithaca, is really pretty! Princeton is posh as hell, but also very pretty, and as far as the bigger cities go, San Francisco is simply amazing.
Now, you're right about the modern element. There's nothing like Paris, Rome, Monaco, London in the United States. San Francisco is probably the closest thing we have to an architecturally really intense city, and even then, it's barely 150, 160 years old.
But this is the way I look at it: since the cities are "new," it makes them historically interesting for different reasons than European cities. Generally the cities and towns, their locations, have a background relating to American expansion in the 19th century. If you drive around the country, the cities themselves make a really neat interconnecting story of how the country grew into what it is today. Some of that history is really sad; in the Midwest, especially, it was directly related to the expropriation and extermination of Native Americans. But New York City, for example, basically became the financial capital of the world because Governor Clinton (DeWitt, not Bill) signed on some crazy plan to build a canal from the Great Lakes to the Atlantic through New York (in the early 1800s!).
So instead of the cities themselves being a story (like, how in Rome just by looking at the architecture you can see the passage of time), American cities are like, a string of stories. I guess that makes them inherently less interesting to look at, but I'm a geek who travels a lot. I was in Abilene, Kansas the other day, and I was like, OOOooOOoo Wild Bill was Marshall of this town!
Tsk tsk. So, what should we call ourselves instead?
The country is officially called 'The United States of America'. Consequently, citizens of the USA are called Americans.
And while I understand the hostility towards us calling ourselves 'Americans' when there are two continents called North and South America, I don't know what a good substitute name would be to indicate their nationality. This is a genuine question. If we're not 'Americans', what are we? I've heard this point raised many times, yet no good substitute or alternate name for citizens of the USA to replace the problematic term.
I'm open to suggestions.
That's awesome, quite true what you say I guess. Doesn't Chicago have old buildings and stuff too?
WTF do you mean by two continents…?
Well everyone in Latin America pretty much call you Gringos (which in C.R. is not a pejorative name anymore, don't know about other countries though). Maybe 'citizens of the U.S.', which is obviously too long, or 'Usonians'. I know I know, until the country is destroyed or something you'll call yourself 'Americans', which in a certain way, you are, but not in the way you mean. I will continue to flame with this issue until I die .
Thanks for the answer!
1. Chicago has some old buildings, but a large chunk of the city was destroyed in 1871, in the Great Fire of Chicago. So, most of the buildings have been built in the 1900's onward. So, I guess it depends on your definition of 'old' The oldest building I've visited in the USA was a church in Massachusetts built in the late 1600's.
2. I've heard 'USAians' thrown around, but that's clunky. But yeah - I guess we stay 'Americans'. Sorry!
We're Americans. From the United States of America. If we were the United States of India, we'd be Indians, not USAins.
And gringo is pejorative. Don't know how you say it's not. I've had it snarled at me plenty of times, and the next moment people will be super nice once I say I'm Puerto Rican.
Like, I understand people don't like Americans. But it's still xenophobia, and it gets old.
Yeah I know of the great fire, I guess there really aren't many buildings left from before that.
Ah crap! Oh well I'll still call you Gringos, in a non-pejorative way!
As I said before, in Costa Rica gringo is not pejorative. Nope, it's not xenophobia, I just hate that you call yourself 'Americans'. Even if you're Puerto Rican, home of the hideous thing called regetón (along with Panamá), you're still a Gringo .
It's snowing here as well and I HATE IT. Fucking winter. It's cold as fuck too.:/ I cannot wait for this thing to be over it but it's only December, still some horrible months to go.=( AIYA!
So, I have another question.
Is this view on US citizens calling themselves 'Americans' common in Costa Rica? Or is it a personal view? Or is it a mix of both? Thanks!
AND...I discovered a term on a completely different forum*, which was, ironically enough, discussing some of the same issues here. The term they used? "US American". It acknowledges that more than one country is under the umbrella of 'the Americas', yet it makes it clear what country they're talking about. And it's not a clunky phrase. I think it's a good compromise. Ideas?
* This is the forum in question - it's actually on Dreamwidth: http://noracharles.dreamwidth.org/181913.html?format=light
It's snowing here as well and I HATE IT. Fucking winter. It's cold as fuck too.:/ I cannot wait for this thing to be over it but it's only December, still some horrible months to go.=( AIYA!
still snowing...
yeaaaaah i'm happy!!!!!
U.S. Americans is an excellent term! Maybe I should start using it instead of 'Gringos' (at least in an international forum like this), since some people may get offended (Naglfar *cof cof* ).
well...in a long period i understand it can be very annoying. but here it's an epic event!
Haha I don't get offended at anything, man! I don't believe in taboo. I'm just saying, gringo is a pejorative term. You call an American a gringo, they don't particularly like it. Reverse the roles; what if Americans decided that spic wasn't a racist term, magically, anymore. Latinos would get pissed off if every American started calling them spics and trying to argue it wasn't a pejorative term. It's interesting because every so often you get racist white people trying to argue the same for nigga / my pals, using the argument that because some black people use it colloquially, it no longer means what it used to. That ignores the history of the word!
Tu sabes bien que esa palabra, "gringo," contiene una historia de resentimiento contra los norteamericanos. Y aunque todo el mundo en las américas, hasta los mismos norteamericanos, entiende que ese resentimiento es válido, no significa que esa palabra no es maliciosa. Yo nunca he viajado a Costa Rica, pero te aseguro que decir que gringo en tu país significa algo diferente que en el resto de latinoamérica es un "tall tale," como decimos acá, de tu parte. =) I know you're just needling Americans by saying that, but when you become casual about disliking a whole group of people, that's the first step towards xenophobia. Even if you don't fashion yourself a xenophobe.