Chinese Whispers
Member
- Jan 6, 2009
- 570
- 0
- 16
Well, if I was to tell someone who hadn't heard Opeth in a short sentence what they played, I think 'progressive death metal' would suffice.
Well, if I was to tell someone who hadn't heard Opeth in a short sentence what they played, I think 'progressive death metal' would suffice.
Obviously it depends on your musical background. If you listen to a lot of death metal, then you're able to spot things that other 'death metal' bands have in common with each other that Opeth don't. If Opeth is the only music you listen to with growls, say, then you'll be more inclined to label it death metal. And since there doesn't seem to be a universal definition of any genre, you can't really say one is right and one is wrong.
That should be enough to stop this discussion.
How your stupid personnal experience could be enough?
Since I responded in that thread, I guess I'll just respost here:
They share some elements with the genre but not so much as to be considered DM (along the lines of Cannibal Corpse, Bloodbath, Nile, etc).
I think that if you compare a song like Dehumanized by Theory in Practice with Wreath by Opeth you will note the difference between a DM band and Opeth. Theory in Practice is DM but Opeth, even in their heaviest, is not (in this example, you could actually say it is quite close).
This of course is not a bad thing. Opeth does not fit neatly into DM just as it does not fit neatly into PM. They share some elements with each style (and others as well) but lean enough towards progressive that they can be rightly labeled an "Extreme Progressive Metal" band (as Metal Archives has them). Personally I don't try to over think this stuff, to me Opeth is Opeth, a metal band that has it's own style and which I love to listen to.