infoterror
Member
- Apr 17, 2005
- 1,191
- 2
- 38
argument for Atheism
Personified gods are most likely a projection, and not a reality. The best religions are transcendent and not dualistic.
argument for Atheism
I'm of the belief that in a world such as ours, religion, regardless of how such beliefs are constructed and accepted (ie., by logic or emotion) is an important part of what it means to be human, and difficult to argue against.
From where I stand I don't see any clear winner or loser in any of this.
I'm of the belief that in a world such as ours, religion, regardless of how such beliefs are constructed and accepted (ie., by logic or emotion) is an important part of what it means to be human, and difficult to argue against.
nothing in this thread would convince me to call myself an Atheist, as 99.9% of what I've read on the topic doesn't either, it's all at best arguing for Agnosticism, but I do have my one argument for Atheism which I'm working on, without which I would see no warrant to call myself an Atheist. I think there is a clear winner, but I've yet to find anyone articulate it clearly, though someone very well may have.
I disagree--spirituality, NOT religion, is an important part of what it means to be human. Religion is the corrupt corporatized version of real spirituality, and leads to nothing but spiritual darkness. Religion, at least the modern concept of such, is in no way an important part of what it means to be human.
Religion. . . continues to provide . . . benefits (ie. . . . reedom from guilt).
Well, what I was getting at was confession and forgiveness.
Religion is mans construction, and it continues to provide many psychological benefits (ie., a means for socialization, freedom from guilt etc.) regardless of how corrupt you may feel it is. Being a part of a religion is healthy in my opinion, and it doesn't even have to make sense.
To say it's "lying to ones self" is probably not as correct as it is to say it's choosing to do that which best serves the individual from their perspective. Sometimes, you just want a bigmac and fries, regardless of the trans-fats. Sometimes in order to overcome our circumstance, we have to "lessen the load", as it were.
That aside, is it even possible to lie to oneself and believe it? This sort of implies a split in mind, but over the longterm each of us conditions ourselves in one way or the other, sometimes in the face of truth, just so that life becomes bearable, it's evolution, we seek to fulfill our needs and I don't think there's anything wrong with that so long as ones opinions do not negatively effect the lives of others.
Well this is the way I see it. I believe in God, I don't pray nor do I worship him in anyway, now it's been stated that you only must solomly believe in God in order to gain entrance to Heaven, unless ofcourse you break any of the 10 commandments many times which will condemn to the deepest depths of Hell.
But some things aren't just fair about Christianity, the second God created a certain person, wouldn't he know where they would go in life? Would they murder thousands of people? Or is this supposed to the work of Satan which provides the impulse to someone to commit a sin and if so, If Satan / Hell / Lucifer never existed would everybody be perfect? Now I myself am not perfect, I have commited sins and have surely regretted few of them.
Basically my view is: If God is true, along with Christianity I will go to Heaven, If Scientology is true I will just die, If it's something else then my oh my there is nothing for me to do.
Nietzsche: The dross are attracted to Christianity with promises of immortality (devised by Paul) "The world revolves around me".
Does Heaven sound a fun place to spend all eternity? Does desiring to go there affect your actions on earth, such that you live your life in anticipation of an afterlife?
An eternity of paradise and joy, like that described in the foolish concept of heaven, would be the worst torture any individual could ever suffer. It would rob them of everything that makes them human, and destroy all meaning in their existance.
I would love immortality, for certain; but an eternity of imperfection, of this hell of earth or elsewhere--a realistic eternity of both suffering and joy, where I would continue to learn infinitely, find love, be hurt, feel fear and hate, feel joy, feel anger, negative with the positive. Anything other than that would be meaningless, "boring" to the extreme.
Why do you reference, "this hell of earth?" Are you saying life here is "hellish" somehow? Just curious what you mean by this.