mutantllama
Active Member
The worse movie in the series.
I liked the first two though.
Scientology, genius.
Fair enough, but if they're going to be there anyway, I'd like to avoid bad accents.If they can't act like the person they're supposed to be portraying, they shouldn't be in the movie at all tbh.
Funny because I thought that movie was pretty terrible and it's a shame that steaming pile of shit was Kubrick's last film.
If they can't act like the person they're supposed to be portraying, they shouldn't be in the movie at all tbh.
I remember thinking it was pretty average. And that it could've been a much better film with better leads. Nicole Kidman is terrible.
I don't think Tom Cruise is that deep.
what you need to understand about 'eyes wide shut' is that it's full of intentional artifice (again, we're talking about kubrick here), cruise and kidman are supposed to look like they're roleplaying at marriage, i honestly think they both do exactly what kubrick wanted them to do. she was married to cruise at the time, there's this blurring of the lines between actor and character - i think kidman admitted that the film doomed their marriage which is disturbing and brilliant from where i'm standing.
the other reason i like kidman in this is that totally ambiguous smile of hers, depending on context it can look affectionate or totally full of fire, which is again perfect for a film which juxtaposes images of her being a horny bitch against her helping her little girl with maths homework. tom cruise is actually just about the best guy for the role, his image has always been quite feminised (rep as closet homo etc) and the film feminises him at every turn after initially presenting him as happy husband-meets-smug womaniser. kubrick basically tears the guy and his marriage to shreds, i love that 'cause i hate tom cruise. it made me realise how much kubrick shares with people like lynch and cronenberg too, sometimes people underestimate just how much of a genius he was.
anyone here seen 'dogville'? that's kidman's best performance for me, astounding really.
On an unrelated note, I saw Dark Knight last night and found it confusing, unnecessarily long, overblown and messy. Heath Ledger was about the only entertaining part of the whole thing, but hardly Oscar-worthy. I don't think I can watch these sorts of movies anymore.
I love Batman and all but it is overrated. Dont get me wrong I think its good but very much overrated. It is indeed to long and to overblown.
I just have a hard time when things get to out of hand. The thing about Batman is that hes a human being. When he slides under trucks with his mc and when he gets those x-ray things in the end its just way to much.
I loved Batman Begins. Particulary the first hour was awesome and I dont think The Dark Knight was close to that awesomeness.
I went into the movie with the mindset that Ledgers performance was overrated because of his death. I am glad to say I was wrong. He was fantastic and I do think he would be worthy of an Oscar nomination for his charachter portrayal. He should get beat by the masterful performance of Rourke as the Ram in "the wrestler" though. He was pure gold in that one. Maybe my favorite movie of 2008 right there.
Suprisingly i've never heard it. Must listen now!Controversial opinion:
Roger Waters' solo album Amused to Death is just as good as any Pink Floyd album.
Suprisingly i've never heard it. Must listen now!
Now before you fap. This is not a picture of Julie Andrews. It's a little boy.