One of my main problems with that logic is, I think people forget that this is a site for many, not for a few.
This makes no sense to me,
it's for the many not the few should imply that nobody gets censored. You're simply redefining "the many" to mean "the few" users who get offended and report other users without realising it.
I understand that this isn't about freedom of speech but a parallel can be drawn between censoring speech that offends people vs. letting people say whatever they like. Hence speech for the many (aka the all) vs the few who wish to censor others.
Might as well do what has been done with the 'n-word' and just format it so that all offensive words are auto-swapped with something harmless.
BUT - I ALL the time am having to defend GMD to new users in private when they message me about the "style" here. I defend the GMD culture - to a degree.
You don't even need to defend the specific GMD culture, just defend the principle of letting the users be free as long as they don't break any laws or share pornographic/graphic violence material I don't see what the problem is.
I mean, plenty of people say things I don't like or even downright hate sometimes but I've never once felt entitled to have mod action levied against them or to have their comments deleted, I don't get how anybody could be
that much of an entitled twat.
Maybe self-restraint should be recommended to all these offended reporters?
I will unlock the thread, but I expect everyone to self moderate, and to report when necessary vs. lashing out and then shitting up threads. Over the course of the last year, LOTS of regulars report/discuss with me that it has become old - this is not a place to fight because you don't agree with someone's opinion because it differs to much from yours. I get that people will give each other shit about it, that's completely fine. But when that turns into infighting, derailing, pages of bickering - even my tolerance for that is done. Nothing - NOTHING - is accomplished or beneficial with that stuff.
I think regardless of where people land on this, most if not all of us know that the thread in question was specifically created for shitting up with arguments and perhaps less than amiable debating. I can see cleaning threads up when a thread has a specific topic being completely ignored but the Controversial Opinions Thread is the GMD dumpster fire.
@CASSETTEISGOD I don't know if you saw that thread before I edited 5-8 (maybe more) pages worth out. 5-8 pages of off topic, fighting, overuse of the word "fag" in its various forms, etc. It was unnecessary - and it passed the threshold of tolerance for a lot of people that day - new AND old. I don't just edit/appear out of nowhere. I respond when things boil over and I use a very "low bar" judgement on when to edit/lock or warn/ban folks.
One of the few GMD shitfests/controversies I had little involvement in shockingly. I've actually been pretty good lately (not great) but this slippery slope shit with certain words becoming off limits leaves a bad taste in my mouth. I like this place so I care if it becomes too censorious, especially since most of us are adults and being told what words we can or can't use is a bit ridiculous.
And again, as I said after the last wave of offended people reporting stuff and having pages of stuff deleted and people being put on notice: why aren't these people using the 'ignore' function if what they're seeing is so bad that they feel the need to report?
Just seems like things are being decided by the most offended users. Hell, the users private messaging the offenders and asking them why they say what they say and to perhaps ease up a bit would be a much better solution than this daycare center method.
Anyways, it's your site Deron so take this with a grain of salt of course.