Controversial opinions on metal

[EternalMetal]

They get too trashed and play like shit live. They didnt used to, but they're fucking losers now.

 

[The Butt]

^ Actually the last two times I saw him (I've seen COB three times, each on the Blooddrunk tour), he nailed every solo absolutely flawlessly. Dunno where and when you saw him, but he seems to be smartening the fuck up.

 

[Saparmurat_Niyazov]

I'll stick with Yngwie for classical-inspired metal guitar shredding. I prefer blues based soloing (which is another reason why I like Yngwie - he's an excellent blues player as well).

EDIT: At the playing drunk comments about CoB, I remember Dimebag Darrell could play his solos perfectly and barely keep himself standing up. With enough rehearsing, playing trashed isn't that impressive of a skill, imo.

 

[The Butt]

Honestly, I hate shred.

COB and Warmen seem to be the lone exceptions for me though. No clue why, I just love the tunes (except Hate Crew Deathroll, aside from 3 or so songs, that shit is ass for the most part).

 

[Hell Patrol]

Controversial Opinion: 99% of metal bands that started after 1985 suck shit.

 

[V.V.V.V.V.]

 

[Hell Patrol]

Are you laughing in agreeance, or in a mocking fashion, of my statement?

 

[Kara-Shehr]

tryingtoohard.jpeg ^^^^^

 

[Saparmurat_Niyazov]

Controversial Opinion: 99% of metal bands that started after 1985 suck shit.

 

[Satanstoenail]

Controversial Opinion: 99% of metal bands that started after 1985 suck shit.

Oh fuck off. Just fucking fuck right off.

 

[The Butt]

CONTROVERSIAL OPINION: 99% OF METAL BANDS THAT STARTED AFTER 1970 SUCK SHIT

AM I ONE OF THE COOL KIDS YET

 

[Beoftw]

heres one. metallica wouldnt have been shit without dave mustaine. shabam!

 

[The Butt]

That's not true at all, since MOP and AJFA are their best albums and contain no Mustaine riffs whatsoever.

I LOVE METALLICA DISCUSSIONS LETS HAVE ANOTHER, HERES A CONTROVERSIAL OPINON THE ONLY GOOD MEALLICA IS HIT THE LITES FROM MEGAFORCE COMPILATION AFTER THAT THEY SOLED OUT

 

[Pitiless Wanderer]

It is actually the opposite. 99 percent of "metal bands" before, not after 1985, suck.

 

[Onder]

Controversial Opinion: 99% of metal bands that started after 1985 suck shit.

It is actually the opposite. 99 percent of "metal bands" before, not after 1985, suck.

You both are retarded tools FYI.

 

[Hell Patrol]

To clarify: the 99% contains bands that some "people" would consider metal such as Korn, Slipknot, A7X, Limp Bizkit, etc. That saturate the market. If we were looking at "real" metal it's probably only 50% that suck shit.

Anyway it's MY controversial opinion so you can all fuck a blender.

 

[The Butt]

I think you misread the thread title. We're supposed to post opinions, not blatant misinformation.

It's okay. We all make mistakes at some point. Except me.

 

[Hell Patrol]

I think you misread the thread title. We're supposed to post opinions, not blatant misinformation.

It's okay. We all make mistakes at some point. Except me.

One mans blatant misinformation is another mans opinion.

 

[Satanstoenail]

To clarify: the 99% contains bands that some "people" would consider metal such as Korn, Slipknot, A7X, Limp Bizkit, etc. That saturate the market. If we were looking at "real" metal it's probably only 50% that suck shit.

Anyway it's MY controversial opinion so you can all fuck a blender.

Nice backpedal there bud. Well done.

 

[mutantllama]

Controversial Opinion: A large majority of metal bands that started after 1995 suck shit.

.