Yeh, that's a fucking brilliant album. I'd be willing to do a fair few things to have his vocal talent (can't remember the guy's name )LichofHell said:check out King Crimson- Red
NineFeetUnderground said:you should probably name a progressive band instead of those heavy metal acts, just fyi.
opeth_353 said:Yeh, that's a fucking brilliant album. I'd be willing to do a fair few things to have his vocal talent (can't remember the guy's name )
Fripp? .. Christ... This is going to annoy me now!
Liquid Tension said:Who on my list isn't progressive?
illidurit said:a better question would be 'why do you think any of those bands are progressive'
Don Corleone said:odd time signatures dont make a band progressive? i thought that was part of the musical structure of a progressive band.
NineFeetUnderground said:odd time signatures in of themselves dont make a band progressive, although early on in progressive rock meanderings, it was very en vogue to have odd time signatures included in most of your songs, so thats a stereotype that has stuck. and since then gotten MUCH worse due to bands that fit the "progressive metal" (although rarely progressive in the truest sense of the word) tag who use odd time signatures and 12 minute solos to stake the claim of being progressive.
affinityband said:lol^ every n00b has heard those bands. fact is, that those bands pretty much rehash what they have done for years, leaving them 'unprogressive'. virtuosos dont make bands progressive just fyi.
Liquid Tension said:LOL...............
Knowing the difference doesn't make you smart....
Thanks....
illidurit said:so if the genre termed progressive doesn't entail progressive music then why the fuck is it called progressive? because noobs like you propagate it