SOG, your making comparison to Dimmu Cradle and METALLICA!!!! with the Anthems album. How blind are u?
Last I checked, you don't need to
see to be able to listen to music, genius. I suppose I shouldn't expect
too much for someone too intellectually lazy to bother to type two letters.
The subject is not so black and white.
You're the one with all the iron-clad definitives about what Emperor were 'trying' to do, what they 'would of [sic] loved' etc. I'm suggesting that there are inferences that can be made from the evidence that aren't all that flattering to the band.
On your terms when a band decides to progress their sound, on a recording level, not with changing styles or wardrobe, you label them as going for the commercial side of music.
Yeah, I mean, who could
possibly think that a band that simplifies its style, moves the chick friendly instruments up to the top of the mix, introduces more accessible vocal styles, more consonant harmonies, and more nice, pleasantly predictable rhythmic patterns was aiming at increasing their appeal among fans of more mainstream music than black metal? How silly of me...
I can guarantee that Emperor would of loved to enjoy the recording opportunities they received with Antems on their previous albums.
They had those opportunities all along, and
chose not to make use of them. I mean, you do realize that all of their earlier recordings were made in the same studio that
Anthems... was recorded in, right? You know, with access to the exact same equipment?
I guarantee that if Emperor would of been offered a better studio, production and overall recording session for Nightside they would of taken it.
Which shows just how significant your 'guarantees' really are, now doesn't it?
a lot of the sellout/commercial arguing that goes around for bands is pretty stupid, sometimes it is a questionable fact but to argue that Anthems is a commercial release from Emperor, that is just sooooooo crazy.
Funny how long you are on assertions and short you are on evidence, eh?