Nexis said:
and he was trying to label them, as he asked if you would consider opeth to be "slightly goth;" ie, "would you label them as such."
so metal_wrath, fizz, you guys = owned.
I understand that the terms original meanings, I see your point that when it was said "by its true definition" then perhaps in a sense the threadstarter was wrong...but my point was that the term encompasses several meanings...ie, more than one in todays culture. Not too long ago, if you were to say you felt gay, you would have meant happy. Today, the terms general meaning is homosexual, although it encompasses other meanings as well, thats the nature of the english language (the one we are speaking right?)
It is standard practice for english speaking persons to interpret one anothers use of language based on the context and principle of the conversation. In this case, we are discussing a metal band, so it is sort of assumable we arent talking about architecture, but genre conventions.
As for the last comment, I decided to fight fire with fire
"slight (comparative: slighter, superlative: slightest)
slight - small, weak or gentle; not decidedly marked; not forcible; inconsiderable; unimportant; insignificant; not severe; weak; gentle"
Im sorry but that doesnt quite match up to your interpretation of "would you label them as such." The original question ("I was wondering if anyone would consider Opeth to be slightly goth?") doesnt at all imply labelling the band under a distinct genre, but discussing its influences.
So fizz = not quite so owned.