Alright, I checked them 68 mp3's thru; What a great way to ruin an awesome song to yourself
- 2 clearly needs disqualification (louder background track than others)
- 1 track has pops and clicks on it + it was a bit louder than others (if you know this is your submission, contact MarkG immidiately!)
- 1 track had quieter background track than others (if this one gets disqualified, it's up to mark, because unlike boosting the background tracks level, lowering them doesn't make the track sound "instantly better" :Spin
- 4 mixes were missing the lead guitar parts (3 from the a pre-verse and 1 from the end). if these get disqualified, it's up to mark (and maybe jeff)
- 2 unsure cases, the low end seemed a lot louder than on others, but it might be from just the guitars
- 5 mixes that really jumped to your face when you flipped thru the mixes, because the guitars were really mid heavy and loud, and thus made the background track sound louder, but most likely they were not
- 1 mix sounded like it didn't have distortion on one of the rhythm tracks at the beginning(!)
- few mixes (didn't count, less than 10'ish?) had some serious phasing going on in the guitar tracks.
[personal opinion]
In the end I was really amazed by the overall good quality of the submission, but I _HATED_ how similiar all the guitar tracks sounded compared to the previous competitions... Unlike on the previous competition, I didn't hear a single clear "better than others" sounding track. I mean, yeah the 5150 sounds awesome but you could just flip to the next mix and wonder "wtf, did I change the track or not?"
For this I have to blame Jeff, Javi and Ermz (good job lads!), as the track was maybe "too good" sounding for this purpose. It can be a good or a bad thing, but I see it as the track now sounds like there are "big amount of average engineers" and less "my awesomeness as engineering shines thru", because honestly; It's almost impossible to ruin awesome sounding performance with bad tonez
[/personal opinion]