If it has a youtube video, it must be true. Like the 9/11 conspiracy and the fake moonlanding.
About fucking time.
Head inland, more like. There's a greater percentage chance of the meteor hitting water (70%), which means there is a greater percentage chance the impact would affect coastlines more than the inland territories.
ANd if it hit land it would propel thousands of particles into the air, blocking out the sun for a three month duration. Killing all the plants, and eventually covering the earth in a layer of thick frost.
THe only place to survive would be the coast.
ANd if it hit land it would propel thousands of particles into the air, blocking out the sun for a three month duration. Killing all the plants, and eventually covering the earth in a layer of thick frost.
THe only place to survive would be the coast.
PS: None of you smart motherfuckers better come in here like "WELL IT WOULDN'T BE A METEOR THAT HIT EARTH BUT A METEORITE / METEROID / SPACE CHUNK/ WHATEVER THE FUCK". I don't know which is which is which and you know what I mean so go fuck yourself.
If everything is covered in a thick layer of frost, why would going to the coast have a greater chance of survival than just staying where you are?