But she shot once other officers showed up
She and a male officer both shot in reaction to something which is obvious from the footage. She alone didn't react to a perceived threat. That to me demonstrates that she didn't intent to kill him but rather just get him to comply, her unwillingness to shoot him is further implied by the fact that she didn't shoot him the whole time he was supposedly ignoring commands and walking towards his vehicle.
Here's the problem -- how do we know she really thought this? How do we know this isn't an action of self-preservation? Releasing any information that would corroborate this story, the communications for example, would make this situation's PR look much much more favorable. But it hasn't been released.
We don't. But I see no reason to believe it's a lie that he was noncompliant and probably on drugs since he had PCP in his car and he has a history of drug use, plus he was parked in the middle of the road claimig his car was about to blow up.
Will you quit bringing up race? I'm not CF, I have no interest in having a race discussion. The dude made an assessment of a possible perpetrator from far as fuck -- dude is not a reliable source of information or expertise.
Much more likely the helicopter was in contact with the base of operations, not the officers on the ground. There'd be no reason for shared communication between the two
If you say so. But if the helicopter is in contact with command through the radio and so are the ground officers, I think it's likely they have some basic information. Noncompliant, possibly drug addled is base info, especially since the female officer must have radioed in for back-up.
I said or for a reason. If she told him to put his hands on the car, she is at fault. If she allowed him to put his hands on the car, she is at fault. She made a series of errors no matter which way the scenario played out.
What do you mean by, if she allowed him?
If you have no intent to assert control, yes. She had no intention to assert control, she chose to eliminate the threat--not de-escalate. She has to live with that choice.
Again, how is a withdrawal of a gun not an attempt to assert control?
If he's not on drugs, a gun and stern commands is an attempt to assert control.
If he is on drugs and is therefore not acting rationally, a gun probably isn't going to assert anything, but apparently she drew her weapon before it was assumed he was on drugs, according to her because he kept reaching into his pockets.
The odd thing being in this Tulsa case, I don't know if she even realized she had drawn her sidearm and not her taser. Usually when a cop is going to put someone down, their training would instruct them to double tap the suspect. She fired only a single shot, then seemed to stop herself. And from what I've heard, the rest of the officers around her had only drawn their tasers.
That's probably a stretch, besides she admits to consciously drawing her pistol.