Cooledit Pro has 64 tracks. Forestall used 28 of them. CoolEdit 2000 however is just a wave editor which is probably what Misanthrope was thinking of. Ive used lots of different cakewalk programs (Pro Audio 9, Home Studio and Sonar).. and they are all very good, but to me they seemed a bit too complex, too many terms and options and shit.. so ive just stuck with Cooledit coz its easy (although it doesnt handle midi and doesnt have a metronome.. and has a few other things that you have to find workarounds for).Originally posted by YourFuneral
Hey YaYo, I have a question or two about CoolEdit... (You use CoolEdit Pro, not CoolEdit 2000, right? I could go back a couple pages and find that answer but I'm too lazy, heh heh...) Anyways, you did ALL the tracking in CoolEdit Pro? How many tracks does it allow? I've been messing around with Cakewalk Pro Audio 9, have you used it? If so, which is better? Where can I get a copy of CoolEdit Pro? (Without suffering through a billion freak'n popup windows! I HATE those things!)
I'm pretty new to recording on computers... I used to do all my recording on a Digial Recorder but I recently sold it because it was getting old and I've been reading about alot of people recording with computers so I figure, "what the heck! I've got three computers here, I'm sure I can make something work with all that..." Heh heh!
L8r!
Well, my computer is only a 600Mhz, 256MB ram and the cheapest soundcard i could find. Now i can only RECORD 1 track at a time because i only have 1 input.... but on my machine it handled Forestall alright, took a minute to load all the wavs and stuff but other than that it recorded fine.Last time i checked cooledit wasnt a multi-track recording utility, it is a wave editor. So if you do separate takes and mess around with copy/paste well it could be as many tracks as you want just not simultaneously. But besides you need a damn good sound card and probably other equipment im not aware of to do multi track recording with various channels at the same time. I rather use a analog mixer and record each track with metronome, using a multi track recording software. ( thats how i plan on recording my bands demos...if i ever get a descent soundcard, and a faster hdd...and a mixer...)
Nope, i only use a 6 string, and its dropped down to CGCFAD (ie just dropD tuning down a tone).Yayo are you in standard tuning in this song?
Well, my computer is only a 600Mhz, 256MB ram and the cheapest soundcard i could find. Now i can only RECORD 1 track at a time because i only have 1 input.... but on my machine it handled Forestall alright, took a minute to load all the wavs and stuff but other than that it recorded fine.
Yeh i only use 44hz 16bit quality, Forestall ended up being 300MB total. And yeh there are definite hassles and having bigger faster computer would be good... but im just saying its not absolutely nescassary. Sure it takes some time processing certain effects but when your recording its good to have time to think anyway.Originally posted by Misanthrope
Well what cuality do you use? how many takes you use? if you use 24bit 96hz cuality it would chunk away 100s of mbs per minute, multiply that for each track, multiply that for each channel and you have and idea of the ammout of space used. Not only that 1 minute waits and undo/redo's can get to be fucking frustrating if you are editing alot and dont have an infinite amount of free time. This is why if i ever get serious about home recording im planning on getting a pc with a gb of ram, 2 40 or 50gb scsi drives in a raid configuration, dual processor ( i hear the 64bit amd's will rock ) and water cooling system for the processors ( my city its damn hot, 110 degrees on summer all days, i cant afford processor overload with this heat ).
On top of that an audio card that its worth it ( maybe 400 bucks or so ) and a mixer, plus you work with drum samples but i work with a real drummer who needs top of the line mics for the drumming ( 100 bucks each at the very least, getting at least 4 of them will be another 400 bucks ). It still beats the shit out of a semi or a pro studio if you wanna take your goddamn time to record.
I invent whats appropriate, i know how to build my own chords, but i dont really know the names of most of them just off the top of my head, i mean if its jazz theres a range of minor 7th and major 7th chords, and a lot of sus4 and sus chords...etc etc... if its the metal bits its a lot of 5ths and minor 3rds... but a lot of the time when im harmonising i try not to simply follow an exact third or something, ill try and make one guitar go up while the other goes down for example.. and swap between different harmonies to avoid creating a standard sounding thirds riff or something.Yayo do you write some of the mellow parts of your song in counterpoint? If so how do you go about doing it? Also are there any chords/arpegios/harminizations you find yourself leaning towards offten? I myself like 9, 6, and sus4 chords.
Well, my computer is only a 600Mhz, 256MB ram and the cheapest soundcard i could find. Now i can only RECORD 1 track at a time because i only have 1 input.... but on my machine it handled Forestall alright, took a minute to load all the wavs and stuff but other than that it recorded fine.