Yeah, I've never changed my mind.
PFF has the Saints oline just above the 49ers at 10 (making the 49ers obviously 11). That puts the 49ers either bottom of the top 3rd or top of the middle 3rd. Either way, neither better than NO nor anywhere near "best in the NFL". Now, I can let this oversight pass since *last* year they were much better, and a [slight] slip usually would go unnoticed without sites like PFF.
https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2014/01/13/2013-offensive-line-rankings/3/
Fair enough. I'm mostly basing it off what I've seen from them the past few years, but other than the first Seattle game, I've mostly watched SF when their offense was in a pretty good rhythm.
I have no idea what stats PFF use to create their O-line rankings, but it seems like they definitely put some time into it.
SF has a better rushing attack but their passing attack is twice as worse as their rushing attack is better. As a team, the 49ers led the Saints by 800 yds in rushing. They were beaten by 2,000 passing yards. You're throwing around appeals to subjective and possibly majority evaluations without anything concrete to back it up.
...which would imply that it's not the QB that makes them the better team!
But I'm the one refusing to "look at the evidence".....
Who said you weren't willing to look at the evidence?
I don't think the teams are that different on the whole, but my original point was that to think that it's a easy pick to declare that the 49ers can do what the Saints couldn't do - and with such a huge gap in QB play - leaves it reasonable to assume that the person making such a claim doesn't see that gap.
I agree the teams aren't too far apart but the bolded part is where you go silly on us. Here's a more rational layout of why people think the 49ers can have more success than the Saints in Seattle.
1. The Seahawks are one of the best passing defenses of the past decade. The Seahawks are also very good against the run (8th in yards, 7th in YPA) but if you're gonna attack something on their defense it should be their ground game.
2. San Francisco's offense is based in the ground attack; the Saints, a timing-based passing game.
Therefore, the 49ers offense is a better MATCHUP for the Seahawks defense than the Saints offense is.
This could be further supported by the fact that 49ers play a more physical style of offense, which is a better match up for Seahawks, big, physical DBs. Also, the 49ers scheme and personnel are better suited to the Seattle environment than the Saint's are.