good god man
Orden Ogan are pretty good and that song you posted was certainly quite solid, but let's be honest about various aspects of the music: their orchestral/symphonic work is not as mind-blowing as Haggard, Fairyland, or Celesty, their choirs aren't a powerfully epic as Bride Adorned, Blind Guardian, Thy Majestie, or Therion, their keyboards aren't as blisteringly-good as Balflare, Sonata Artica, or Children Of Bodom, their guitar solos aren't as technically-complex as Pathfinder, Rhapsody of Fire or Dragonforce, they don't have the soaring operatic vocals of (again) Pathfinder or early Nightwish and they aren't as brutal or intense as Wintersun or Ensiferum - they're just reasonably decent in all the above categories, but master of none.
As misguided as you may be, I'm just curious: which bands do you think turned into "absolute shit" and which do you think were that way to begin with?
Pathfinder
Thy Majestie
Sabaton
Ensiferum
Dragonland
Freedom Call
Wuthering Heights
Balflare
Luca Turilli
Stratovarius
Keldian
Ancient Bards
Sunrise
Celesty
Bride Adorned
Fairyland
Therion
Rhapsody Of Fire
Haggard
Children Of Bodom
Sonata Arctica
Nightwish (old)
Elvenking
Dragonforce
Gamma Ray
Epica
Helloween
Blind Guardian
Power Quest
Holy Knights
Battlelore
Iced Earth
Amorphis
Thanks man.
I started to respond last night, then realized I didn't care about wrong I was.
And Ensiferum, CoB, and Wintersun aren't powermetal.
So much of that stuff is just standard boring powermetal.
I couldn't stand Unia. The only thing Sonata Arctica really had going for them was that their songs were fun. After Reckoning Night, the fun factor decreased dramatically.
Wow. Well, there's no way I'm listening to all that shit that I've already listened to anyway.
Orden Ogan just writes damn good songs. I don't care how rip-roaring a band's solos are, or how blistering its keyboards are, or how epic its choirs are. If they don't write good songs, I'm not listening to them. Fairyland writes way better songs than Pathfinder. And I don't care how many years a band spends recording an album just so they can have real choirs; I'll take fake choirs in better songs, please.
I can see where you though the 'fun' factor was gone. The two albums 'Unia' and especially 'The Days of Grays' were pretty dark for Sonata Arctica.
Have you give 'Stones Grow Her Name' a spin? I have and would still describe that album as 'fun'.
Technical prowess and musical complexity can in fact be measured in scientific/mathematic terms that don't involve illogical themes such as mood or emotion, which is why I have mentionined superb keyboard/guitar/orchestral/vocal/choir/drumming skills in relation to such terms. You're basically broadly defining songs as "good" or "shit" based purely upon your opinion without any corroborating evidence which is not very convincing at all.
I also get the impression that you tend to rush to judgement upon music very quickly and refuse to even listen to the same music twice. I never write off music as "junk" upon the first listen unless it's cheesy pop music or something obviously trashy like that, and I find that I can only appreciate the true quality of the music after several listens - open-mindedness is indeed a virtue in the modern world.
Well, I'll apologize if it offended you; but technical skill doesn't translate into good music, in my opinion. I think that Steve Vai is a hell of a guitar player, but I can't listen to him for more than two to three minutes. Songwriting is more than jacking off on your instrument.