Fetzer is a cool guy .
WHO IS YOUR MASTEEEEEEER, IN THIS SHALLOW GRAAAAAAVEE
:c wages of sin is still the bestest
ok, so question:
In the movie, Joker tells different stories about how he got those cuts on his face that "extend" his smile. In one version of the story, his father did it to him and in another version, he did it to himself because of his wife. But what's the real deal here... how did that happen to his face? anyone know?
I noticed this too but wasn't sure if I could recall correctly. I don't think he said (I can't recall precisely) his father did it but he did it for his wife. Interesting. If he did in fact state that was how he got the scars in both of his stories, it was probably done intentionally by the writers to portray him as a crazy who will say (and do anything). If you ever met a delusional psychopath you would know they say many things that are imaginary and contradictory.
:c wages of sin is still the bestest
Also....Anthems of rebellion!
BUT RotT is almost equally epic to WoS.
Also....Anthems of rebellion!
BUT RotT is almost equally epic to WoS.
maybe I can help your memory...remember his story about how his dad used to be a heavy drinker and one night his mother was yelling at the dad so the dad was about to beat her up, but instead he turned and saw little joker and saw the serious look on his face, and said "why so serious? put a smile on" or something like that. and that's when the dad supposedly cut his face. I think this was the version that Joker told one of those mafia guys...I think the black one.
But also, what he was saying wasn't just imaginary and contradictory. He had a point to his 2 versions of how this happened-- basically it was to spite humanity. For example, his wife (after being cut up herself) couldn't stand to look at him when he cut his own face. and he did all this just to show that he still loved her and looks didn't matter to him. so that was really fucked up on her part. hence, the superficial, misguided humans thing.
Just saw the movie, twice (I snuck into Hellboy 2 inbetween, it sucked)... it was epic. Fucking. Best. Movie. I've. Seen. In. Years. Seriously. Ledger beats Nicholosn's performance which was also great, fuck you Mick)... seriously, I mourn that guy's death now.. only because of that performance, seriously, it was amazing... AMAZING...
And for all those who haven't seen it yet... GO NOW! Or else I will do a little magic trick with a pencil
EDIT: I'm still in awe, I didn't think Ledger had that in him.
why do all these superficial movies make the most at the box office? I think that just shows how stupid our culture has come to become.
Movies that are truly good are the ones like Apocalypse Now and Lost in Translation. Like movies that have some essence to them, and aren't just all "hollywood" if that makes any sense.
spiderman sucks ass btw.
I'm sorry, but I just can't resist.
FUCK YOU.
Sorry for that, but you know you deserved it. And if you don't, you should.
I hate people that criticize movies for being "superficial". "Oh yeah, I like Little Miss Sunshine better than National Lampoon's Vacation because it had one character that was a Nietzsche freak". And fuck, "Apocalypse Now" is one of the most BORING, yes, you read that right, BORING movies EVER.
What I really hate about those pseudo-intellectual types is that they try so hard to squeeze whatever references they can to make themselves look smart from a movie, that many times they actually miss what the movie is all about! I've seen that happen a thousand times. And people are just so busy trying to sound smart and cool that they forget to have FUN with the freaking movie.
One of my teachers brought "Mindwalk" for us to watch one day. Here is the Rotten Tomatoes link. It was one of the most snobby, superficial movies I have EVER SEEN IN MY LIFE, and check the T-Meter on that: 88%. For those who haven't watched it, Mindwalk should actually be called "Wikipedia: The Movie". It's pretentious beyond all imagination with "FEED YOUR MIND" written on the poster, and just a shallow, shallow pseudo-intellectual masturbatory movie. And no, it brings NOTHING new to the table. NOTHING.
There's NOTHING wrong with Hollywood movies, made just to entertain. There's NOTHING wrong with Rambo 4. There's NOTHING wrong with Iron Man. There's NOTHING wrong with Ratatouille. There's NOTHING wrong with Zoolander. There's NOTHING wrong with Kill Bill.
There IS something wrong, though, with the types that try to cherry-pick the movies they like, by judging if they have "essence" in them, even if they fucking DON'T.
I pity the folks that can't allow themselves to have fun with the mainstream cultural productions. I honestly do. They are fooling themselves so hard they are actually believing it, and that's really sad. It's not intelligent, it's just a way to set yourself apart, and it's a real waste of time and quality of life.
Really, an experiment to everyone who knows a LITTLE bit of science in this board. I am being serious. Go rent "Mindwalk" and "Toy Story" at the same time, and watch them. Then come back and tell me which one of them has more "essence" in it. I swear to God, by the time one of the characters start screaming "Pablo Neruda" at the end of Mindwalk... if you have any kind of honesty inside of you... you are going to wish you never wasted your time with such a ridiculous excuse for a movie.
Yet, the T-meter rated it 88%. It is really FUCKING SAD.
I'm sorry, but I just can't resist.
FUCK YOU.
Sorry for that, but you know you deserved it. And if you don't, you should.
I hate people that criticize movies for being "superficial". "Oh yeah, I like Little Miss Sunshine better than National Lampoon's Vacation because it had one character that was a Nietzsche freak". And fuck, "Apocalypse Now" is one of the most BORING, yes, you read that right, BORING movies EVER.
What I really hate about those pseudo-intellectual types is that they try so hard to squeeze whatever references they can to make themselves look smart from a movie, that many times they actually miss what the movie is all about! I've seen that happen a thousand times. And people are just so busy trying to sound smart and cool that they forget to have FUN with the freaking movie.
One of my teachers brought "Mindwalk" for us to watch one day. Here is the Rotten Tomatoes link. It was one of the most snobby, superficial movies I have EVER SEEN IN MY LIFE, and check the T-Meter on that: 88%. For those who haven't watched it, Mindwalk should actually be called "Wikipedia: The Movie". It's pretentious beyond all imagination with "FEED YOUR MIND" written on the poster, and just a shallow, shallow pseudo-intellectual masturbatory movie. And no, it brings NOTHING new to the table. NOTHING.
There's NOTHING wrong with Hollywood movies, made just to entertain. There's NOTHING wrong with Rambo 4. There's NOTHING wrong with Iron Man. There's NOTHING wrong with Ratatouille. There's NOTHING wrong with Zoolander. There's NOTHING wrong with Kill Bill.
There IS something wrong, though, with the types that try to cherry-pick the movies they like, by judging if they have "essence" in them, even if they fucking DON'T.
I pity the folks that can't allow themselves to have fun with the mainstream cultural productions. I honestly do. They are fooling themselves so hard they are actually believing it, and that's really sad. It's not intelligent, it's just a way to set yourself apart, and it's a real waste of time and quality of life.
Really, an experiment to everyone who knows a LITTLE bit of science in this board. I am being serious. Go rent "Mindwalk" and "Toy Story" at the same time, and watch them. Then come back and tell me which one of them has more "essence" in it. I swear to God, by the time one of the characters start screaming "Pablo Neruda" at the end of Mindwalk... if you have any kind of honesty inside of you... you are going to wish you never wasted your time with such a ridiculous excuse for a movie.
Yet, the T-meter rated it 88%. It is really FUCKING SAD.