It's not a stalemate since not being able to disprove something is not evidence for something's existence. When confronted with a lack of evidence, a lack of belief should be in order.
Can you prove that he does?
And now we have the stalemate that every religious discussion boils down to.
EDIT: Ninja'd by CC.
what do I lose if he doesn't exist?
if God doesn't exist my life was wasted trying to live for Christ in vain, and it means i lost this argument.
Bullshit. If God doesn't exist that means you've spent your whole life telling people lies and living for a lie. The entire meaning for your life is thrown out the window. Whereas the meaning for my life will still be intact either way, since I live my life in the realm of what I know, I.E. making my life as good as possible for myself and for those around me. If I have helped one person be happier (which I have) then the meaning of my life is intact and true, either way.
better than eternal separating from God in hell.
and if there is no God, then life is all about what makes me happy right? and being a Christian is what makes me happy, so i win either way in the end.
No. I live my life in being happy in truth, and you live your life in being happy in lies (if God doesn't exist). Look at it this way: you are happy in this neat little bubble you've built for yourself and I am happy in the real world. My life has more meaning and more truth. It's not just happiness I'm talking about.
Where the fuck did you learn logic? Or the ability to read for that matter...
I like Pascal's Wager because it fails on so many levels it is almost impressive. Not only is it in literally no way a convincing argument for what it supposedly tries to argue (still giving him the benefit of the doubt for it being a posthumous argument that he was never able to defend or elaborate on further), but it is at the same time practically an insult to religion itself. If I were either God myself, or a devoutly religious person, I'm pretty sure I would find the very premise of it insulting anyway.
or im living in the truth, and your the one with the little bubble, and when you die you are tortured for all eternity for rejecting the truth even tho it was right in front of you.
you assume your right, but have no way of knowing until you die. and if you were wrong, well i guess it sucks for you.
or im living in the truth, and your the one with the little bubble, and when you die you are tortured for all eternity for rejecting the truth even tho it was right in front of you.
you assume your right, but have no way of knowing until you die. and if you were wrong, well i guess it sucks for you.
Except our beliefs are based on reason and yours are based on an ancient textor im living in the truth, and your the one with the little bubble, and when you die you are tortured for all eternity for rejecting the truth even tho it was right in front of you.
you assume your right, but have no way of knowing until you die. and if you were wrong, well i guess it sucks for you.
*goes to google*