The Whining and Bitching Thread

Allowing gays to serve and allowing women to serve in combat situations are two different issues and should not be compared at all.
 
Mathiäs;9390226 said:
Allowing gays to serve and allowing women to serve in combat situations are two different issues and should not be compared at all.

I said everything should be equalized if they are going to allow gays in the military, not merely allowing women into combat roles (which plenty already are, merely not in the infantry MOS specifically). No gender specific training, standards, etc., since that is also a form of "discrimination".
 
Although I don't necessarily disagree with you, I think you underestimate the vast chasm of differences between the heterosexual/homosexual and male/female distinctions.
 
You haven't seen how the obvious homosexuals act in the military, and that the average heterosexual woman is more qualified to be in the military (with ideal, "discriminatory" standards) than the average homosexual.
 
You haven't seen how the obvious homosexuals act in the military, and that the average heterosexual woman is more qualified to be in the military (with ideal, "discriminatory" standards) than the average homosexual.

Why would obvious homosexuals who are poorly aligned with soldiers' standards join the military at all if there's no draft? For the eye candy?

There are loads of closet gays too of course. Sooo many Craigslist ads trolling for BJs and HJs and J/O from Sasebo.
 
Why would obvious homosexuals who are poorly aligned with soldiers' standards join the military at all if there's no draft? For the eye candy?

Maybe because they need job and the military is always hiring? Eye candy is a bonus. Since its guarunteed at least in basic training that you will see members of the same sex naked, it's a legitimate (or more accurately, illegitimate) reason.
 
Maybe because they need job and the military is always hiring? Eye candy is a bonus. Since its guarunteed at least in basic training that you will see members of the same sex naked, it's a legitimate (or more accurately, illegitimate) reason.

If you think that homosexuals make hugely-life-altering decisions such as enlisting in military service purely based on whether or not they'll see other dudes naked...

...you're...just...so goddamn dumb.
 
I've never known any homosexual men to make physical or non physical advances towards straight men. You forget also that most gay men have pretty good gay-dars, and usually if you're straightforward to them that you're not gay they won't bother you anymore. Sure, they'll throw out the odd awkward comment just to get a reaction out of you, but it's usually just a joke. The more homophobic you seem, the more they'd want to "troll" you this way. If they

Besides, how the fuck do they get past the basic military training initially if they're not pulling their weight? Slackers or retards usually get weeded out then.
 
Let's put it this way Dak...even if I was majorly hurting for a job and they made the showers in basic training coed, I still wouldn't join. C'mon.

also, there's gay porn, so they could just watch that if they wanted to see some naked dudes. And the naked dudes in the gay porn would be making out. DOESN'T THAT JUST DISGUST YOU BRO.
 
I've never known any homosexual men to make physical or non physical advances towards straight men. You forget also that most gay men have pretty good gay-dars, and usually if you're straightforward to them that you're not gay they won't bother you anymore. Sure, they'll throw out the odd awkward comment just to get a reaction out of you, but it's usually just a joke. The more homophobic you seem, the more they'd want to "troll" you this way. If they

this. seriously. what the fuck does it matter what one's sexual preference is? having a couple of gay family members and other gay/lesbian friends, this is pretty much exactly how it is.