Altitudes
Stay Frosty
I honestly could not vote for a candidate that is a fundamentalist or one whom holds a strong belief/faith in creationism. It says a lot about their rationality and judgment.
There is enough evidence toward the scientific end that creationism is an irrational choice. You seek the evidence, it's how one learns how things work.
I agree that scientific evidence disputes most of creationism. I just want to see said evidence besides the age-old Darwin, big bang, and evolution theories.
My point still stands. There will always be an argument for both sides, and either side saying the other is wrong is just two sides of the same coin.
If we're going to speak about firm, concrete, hard evidence then let's see it; for both sides. Until this evidence is presented for all the world to see, none of us have a leg to stand on. Only theories.
If we're going to speak about firm, concrete, hard evidence then let's see it; for both sides. Until this evidence is presented for all the world to see, none of us have a leg to stand on. Only theories.
L Ron Hubbard did it, and he was just a boy-touching liar. just think of what YOU could accomplish!I wish I had created God, I would have made him cooler.
This is the essence of science - there is no hard proof, only theories. All we get to go by in life are clues about how things are, and we interpret those clues in varied ways. Religion sticks to a strict interpretation of those clues (and a different interpretation for each religion), whereas we developed science as a way of testing which interpretations are valid.
The word is hypothesis, not theory.
It would be one thing if the word theory wasn't used to mean theory anymore but to mean hypothesis, but it's still used in the correct manner, so you'd be well advised to use it correctly.