^ i think we should have sex.
this one is quite good, though, i have to admit, haha:
WTF HE GAVE MASTER OF PUPPETS 0%That UltraBoris guy have quite impressive reviews, I think. But in Opeth he's made a bad mistake. And here's link if anyone is intrested to see: UltraBoris reviews
I like Metal Archives for the fact that it literally has a largest database of bands I have ever seen on one site; it also helps that you can find whatever you are looking for just by giving a few key words.
The point system is a good idea if it is not abused, but -- that in itself is the problem with all systems.
Ultraboris.....ehh; he's given some good reviews (then again, I'm quite partial to some of the bands he cocksucked for points) - I will say this though. You CANNOT take the album rating percentage to be an accurate measurment of the albums quality itself, only you can do that. The good and the bad reviews just help flesh out the different opinions of people. For people who love old school thrash and aren't into some of the more melodic and non-straightforward song structures, well, then Ultraboris' reviews may be good on intention.
I will say he was definately hard on Opeth though....I mean damn.
WTF HE GAVE MASTER OF PUPPETS 0%
jesus!!!!
who can take him seriously after that?
hes on crackdid you notice that st anger gets 1 points when master gets 0? that means master is infinitely worse than st anger. lol
the guy is obviously full of shit and is really not worth talking about.
Then why are you talking about him?the guy is obviously full of shit and is really not worth talking about.
Heh, they mention the Opeth reviews done by a guy named Ultraboris, I looked them up:
He gives Blackwater Park 3 out of 100
Damnation 19 out of 100
Still Life 6 out of 100
Man...no wonder most reviews on that site are messed up.
WTF HE GAVE MASTER OF PUPPETS 0%