That is a really weird rating system, a scale of 1 to 100? Weird!
not as bad!?It's certainly not as bad as Saint Anger, proud owner of a former record-low "3%" rating
His reviews are incredibly inconsistent. He seems to have a grudge against certain bands. But a large number of his reviews are insightful and objective, and for M-A thats a great achievement.
If it was a year ago, I would have disagreed with this. However, I've changed quite a lot being here, and I'd have to agree 100%. I can't even stand music with constant shredding where people try to show off their skills anymore. (Minus a couple bands)Emotion, power and interest > Technique and speed.
Emotion, power and interest > Technique and speed.
Agent Steel - Unstoppable Force "Great speed metal, occasionally thrashy." - 80%
Anacrusis (US) - Suffering Hour "High quality thrash here" - 77%
Annihilator - Alice in Hell "Nifty, catchy fast thrash" - 71%
Anthrax - State of Euphoria "Nice fucking thrash!" - 80%
Destruction - The Antichrist "This is how modern thrash should be done" - 86%
Opeth - Blackwater Park "Blopeth" - 3%
it seems to me that the ultraboris douche never actually listens to most of the whole songs... he called benighted an accoustic passage...
Is it really so hard to believe that some people can actually listen to an opeth album and NOT LIKE IT? >![]()
thats not what n-mayh was saying bro. he was saying that if you're going to review smth, you should at least listen to it.
Maybe we can all agree to disagree with UltraBoris' opinion on Opeth. But I suppose that wouldn't be any fun, would it.