JayKeeley said:Am I seeing things right? That this thread has been read over 15,000 times? And from that, only 30 posts?
Nah can't be....can it?
Do people literally surf forums and just read without posting? I always see 'non-members' logged in to this forum, but that can just as easily be actual members who have logged out just so they can remain anonymous.
*cough* I wonder *cough*
Papa Josh said:Either that or there isn't that much to dispute when it comes to our reviews..
phyre said:The view counts on UM are broken currently. There are threads that have existed for like 3 days, with 2 replies and 18000 views or so. There's obviously something fishy with the new beta of the forum software.
NAD said:Another porn thread would be good, now that the 24 thread will be gone for awhile.
NAD said:No it wasn't me... I thought it was Josh! I'll bet I would have become a staffer sooner if it was me though!
Hey if you get paid for inviting me, I want to get paid for working here!npearce said:I told him. Where's my commision check?
neal said:oh, and a big fucking thumbs down for the SETI review as well.
-neal