Cythraul
Active Member
- Dec 10, 2003
- 6,755
- 133
- 63
And I thought you were supposed to be the "philosopher" around here. I'm not rejecting the idea of property or of capitalism, just pointing out that there is a trend to convert things which were formerly publicly available to private property. Intellectual property is a relatively modern creation. And the war on downloading is purely a result of political lobbying by giant labels to protect their control over the music we hear. As long as they want to forcefeed the population the same lowest common denominator crap, keep paying commercial radio stations to spin their bands etc etc, it's seems to me it's our fucking DUTY to download to break their control. Labels and bands who put out quality music will always be rewarded, not harmed, by downloading, because as most of us here have shown, people will still pay for a quality product.
Yeah, buddy. My whole area of study involves READING SHIT CAREFULLY which is a skill I've come to cultivate over the years. But y'know, some shit is just pretty obvious; like, I don't even have to read it that carefully to understand what's going on, e.g. the following:
challenge_everything said:The definition of what is "property" capable of being stolen is not handed down from high heaven; it's arbitrarily created by capitalist governments to protect big business.
Right. What the fuck am I supposed infer from the above? You are claiming that the definition of 'property' is arbitrary. That is not something I've made up. It's not even something I've inferred from what you've said. It's something I see right there in the hippie shit you've written plain for all to see. You said nothing about intellectual property in particular. You're just talking about property as such. Don't think you can just go around making "profound" claims and I won't notice.