Ahhh, good to see a nice interesting thread..Id have to say that overall i prefer my metal to be sans the anti-religious beliefs, mainly because it gets tiresome (and for people who dont seem to like religion they sure do seem to spend alot of time getting worked up over it). I dont mind the legitimate expression of anti-religious ideals, but I think this has become nothing more than a cliche, something that anyone can gripe over without putting any thinking into it, and expect to get universal nods and murmurs of agreement.
I do think lyrics are a vastly important part of music though, because to me lyrics help to convey what music means to those who wrote it. When i listen to Still Life I better understand what themes, what emotions, what ideas, what twists and what turns mean by understanding what the storyline is about. Sometimes this isn't as important, and the lyrics only have meaning in a metaphorical or atmospheric sense, or have little to no meaning at all, but I never presume this. Bah, to hell with all the explanation; i just like attempting to sing it to myself.
AlexGuinness said:
If the religious or sometimes political theme is higher in profile than the music, then something is generally wrong and I tend to avoid it. Some of the things that happened in Norway around the "true scene" just prove that there are mentally ill people in most countries as far as I am concerned.
Man, is that ever true. Whether Christian, Satanist, Muslim or whatever, theres still morons who think they know everything, and all else is subservient to them telling people this. I hate feeling like there is an ulterior motive to music.
As far as religion is concerned, I consider myself to be Irreligious. By that, I simply mean that I disagree with ORGANISED religion. I think it causes more pain, suffering, hatred, death and conflict than anything else I can call to mind. It is a global disease. Perhaps worse than that, it is a watertight excuse for some truly unpleasant people to do exactly what they want... all in the name of religion. We exist in an era that criticising someone's religious beliefs or motivations is considered more wrong than what has been done.
Does this mean that Religion itself is to blame, or people and how we warp ideas/ideals to our own uses? I think much of the problem with organised religion is that it has been politics thinly guised for far too long; nations would send out their chosen religious peons to convert a region before they came in to take it over outright. I dont like the idea of uniformly blaming religion for people being bastards; it just seems like shifting blame.
Don't even get me started on the hypocrisy of the Church. Anything that is holier than thou, but will cover up the exploitation of women, priests buggering choirboys and all other manner of ills to protect its holier than though pedestal is intrinsically wrong. Easier to be swept under the carpet though for most people.
Agreed. Buuuuut that doesn't mean that this has to stay the same, as organised religion is run by people, interpreted by people, and for people-oriented aims. If there is enough social pressure it will change.