Wolfman Von Jones
The trouble with you
Ha! I had forgotten all about that
. Maybe if you cross my palm with silver we'll talk about the tenure
.
Nick
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0dd6/a0dd67a17ec8b6e6bcb45d7047f3d9bfe87084bb" alt="Smile :) :)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3aeb5/3aeb5f3d55a367644c1d14977f963bfad23769a9" alt="Big Grin :D :D"
Nick
Wolfman Von Jones said:For those who still remember me, and Im sure a few of you do, all I have to say is that life is like getting kicked in the taint with a size 13 (USA) steel-shanked boot. You know
? Now I think Im going to vanish again for another 5 months.
Wolfman Von Jones said:@Rahvin: Have my children
Deathmetal_head said:I'm feeling pretty gutted at the death of Steve Irwin The Crocodile Hunter, rest in peace man
hyena said:I met a guy in July. He lives in another country. I liked him as a person but didn't feel particularly attracted.
hyena said:I even went as far as telling him that I wish I had fallen in love with him but I hadn't (you know, honesty and all), but he reassured me telling me he wasn't head-over-heels in love either so there was no reason to worry.
hyena said:and he said "I want to be very clear on one thing: you don't think we are on a romantic track, don't you?".
hyena said:@fireangel: honestly i don't think that there are only 2 states of the world, ie "i'm completely blown away by guy A and will die of anguish if i don't sleep with him in the next 24 hours" and "i want guy A to be my friend, end of the story".
actually, the strongly passional response is a rarity for me (eventhough it happens every now and then), and it shouldn't be trusted anyway because these things typically go away. in this specific case, i was interested in the guy, in a let's-wait-and-see way, not in a please-marry-me-now way. then he did nice things and we had interesting discussions and i saw him again + found him more attractive than i had at first encounter, so the let's-wait-and-see thing became rather "why not give it a try?". i didn't give any importance to the fact that he didn't want to jump my bones the moment he saw me either: we're not 16, so that should not be that important. i realize now that i was wrong, but still the whole thing is quite weird.
edit: i think you're really right where your point "it wasn't his game anymore" is concerned. when he received my books, he said he was upset "because normally i see myself as the one who does the giving". right.
hyena said:@fireangel - 1 word: sex. that's where one draws the line (well, that's where i draw the line) between mates and lovers.
Weird, when I read this I instantly thought, is it not possible to be lovers and not have sex... but it's more reasonable to question the vise-versa and say is it not possible to have sex and just be mates? I'm talking generally more than personally, but I am interested in your take on this.hyena said:@fireangel - 1 word: sex. that's where one draws the line (well, that's where i draw the line) between mates and lovers.
UndoControl said:Sex without love is pointless. The only sex should be lovemaking, and that can only happen when both persons love each-other at least very much.
/ my two lipas (cents)