That kinda defies the point of being progressive tbh.
Also, Atheist's music is in no way about technicality.
Heavy Metal was cleary defined in the 60's and 70's ?.
Progressive music is not about being exceedingly technically complex, so no. In fact, much of progressive music is not very technical in any fashion. Progressive music has a specific type of song structures as well.
This is all well and good, but how isn't Atheist a technical death metal band?
Do you actually read my posts, or do you prefer to spend your time thinking up clever little insults? I've made my case pretty clearly; you're free to reject it but denying that I've made an argument is fucking stupid. I'm done with this for tonight; we can continue tomorrow if you want to insult me some more.
Also, Atheist tend to have more complex riffs whereas with tech death bands they switch riffs a lot and play faster but the riffs are less complicated, although they generally involve lots of left hand movement and advanced playing techniques.
It is, i don't think ive ever had anyone on ignore.ignore list is so sad...
They don't use chromatic riffing or any of that shit.
Basically, they don't play like other death metal bands. They're more based in jazz. I would call them progressive. I simply would not put them in the tech death category because that category has come to mean a certain style which they simply do not play.
They wrote technically complex music. They didn't set out to write the most technical shit they could.
It is, i don't think ive ever had anyone on ignore.