the definition of a masterpiece is all up to the individual listener. i think that its silly, pointless, and egotystical to categorize good, bad, masterpiece-worthy music. sure, there are albums that have gone down in history as masterpieces. but, thats more of a landmark or hall of fame type of thingy.
too often do i see this.
"(album)" is fucking brilliant....perfect songwriting, production. this album is a masterpiece."
the rest of the thread
"omg...failure"
"sounds like you need to listen to more music"
"you have no taste for music"
"what the fuck?"
etc.
seriously, why make remarks like this? its so fucking stupid. you're not going to change that person's mind. that person is right, the album IS a masterpiece. anyone that argues against that is WRONG...and they sound like a fucking idiot.
back on track now...yah, so according to where i stand on what makes a masterpiece...its quite possible that every note of music ever recorded or played is a masterpiece. someone out there might just fucking love it, for whatever reasons.