true....but he's been handed everything he's ever had, never worked for a single thing...and his daddy's buddies bailed him out of innumerable business failings. He works exclusively for big business and the wealthy, while selling out the people he's supposed to represent. and finally, the public is beginning to wake up to the royal ass fucking they've been receiving for five years - now 50 % now say they believe they were deliberately misled by Bush about the WMD, his personal approval rating is the lowest its been, he barely finished his first term with a marginally minute gain in jobs over THE ENTIRE FOUR YEARS (the economy has to grow by thousands and thousands of jobs PER MONTH just to keep pace)...I could go on and on.
No Osama....record oil prices, despite our unprovoked attack on a sovereign nation...
and don't believe their bullshit change-of-story that, well, we still had to go into Iraq because Saddam was a really mean dude...bullshit, there are sadistic dictators all over the world we're doing nothing about, and even coddling. This war was about nothing but Bush's ego, and the oil - except that their poor planning and a completely unexpectedly (by them) insurgency is keeping us from stealing it. (Remember how Wolfowitz said, "I wouldn't be surprised to see statues of George W. Bush being erected in Baghdad."? yeah, right.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying Kerry would have been better. But it would be damn hard to be worse. If the American public is willing to accept complete mediocrity, then so be it...but I'm not.
whoops I completely tantrumed and missed your point:
EVERLOSTINDEADETERNITY said:
i mean he has to keep relations with an entire world smooth.
except that he hasn't. he's completely alienated Europe, the entire muslim world, ignored Africa, tried to meddle in Venezuela (I think that's the country)...this Connecticut cowboy couldn't be a diplomat if you spotted him the "d.i.p." and the "m.a.t."
