BloodyScalpel said:On the lower price range (<1000) all the ibanez I tried were superior in sound and playability to...uh....'equivalent' jacksons.
But the top of the line ones from jackson seem to be slightly superior to me.
For the record, the only really beautiful ibanez guitars i've seen were the S series. Those are gorgeous and awesome guitars. I don't like the pointy look of the average RG much.
BloodyScalpel said:I also agree with elysian when he says jems are overpriced and there are better ibanez guitars :Spin:
BloodyScalpel said:For the record, the only really beautiful ibanez guitars i've seen were the S series. Those are gorgeous and awesome guitars. I don't like the pointy look of the average RG much.
But now they have a better bridge....=P damn they COULD have kept the sharktoothHylian said:
I happen to own a very nice Ibanez S470 from 2000 or so, before they adopted these ridiculous wave inlays. Mine still has decent looking inlays.
The current S470 is the old S370. They discontinued the old S470 and bumped up the number on the S370.BloodyScalpel said:But now they have a better bridge....=P damn they COULD have kept the sharktooth
but they also put the ZR trem on it, which is quite possibly one of the best tremelos ever made.Hylian said:The current S470 is the old S370. They discontinued the old S470 and bumped up the number on the S370.
Elysian893 said:i win by default, i own both(though i own more ibanez than jackson :Spin: )