NFL 2010

Nobody on defense is "innocent", because everybody on defense has the same job that Harrison has: stopping the ball carrier. Every defensive player has the potential to injure the ball carrier on every tackle made, just as every defensive player has the potential to injure himself on every tackle made, especially if he approaches it timidly. A college player from my alma mater is lying paralyzed in a hospital right now from a tackle that he attempted on Saturday. James Harrison is not a special case at all. It's true that he plays with a greater intensity than perhaps most players, and as a result there is more likely to go wrong between the ball carrier and the tackler that would result in one of them being injured. But that doesn't equate to Harrison being a 'dirty' player or doing anything wrong. Bad things happen sometimes on the field, and it's unfortunate, but you can only do so much to eliminate those bad things.

I don't think you are in a position to estimate the way that Harrison "probably" feels, by the way. That doesn't help the issue being discussed.
 
It's football. Every d man wants to hurt the ball carrier.
I applaud harrison for saying that.
You smash a receiver and he'll think twice about catching the ball over the middle for the rest of the game.
The Atlanta dude that smashed Jackson was awesome. Keep your head up fuckers!
 
If players would actually stop trying to make highlight reel missile tackles and just actually try and bring the ball carrier down like they're supposed to then this wouldn't even be an issue.

And the Dunta Robinson hit on Jackson was clearly an illegal hit, idiot lead with his helmet and for that gave not just Jackson but himself a concussion as well.

I'm all for player intensity and defenses being able to defend, but player safety HAS to be taken into consideration.
 
...

I don't think you are in a position to estimate the way that Harrison "probably" feels, by the way. That doesn't help the issue being discussed.

You attempted to condemn the article for a sensationalistic title, and I was simply commenting on a section of the article that you left out. The article implies what I said, though my wording may have been poor.
 
BOOM!

Shortly after news broke that Patriots safety Brandon Meriweather has been fined $50,000 for helmet-to-helmet hits, two of his fellow NFL headhunters have also learned that their paychecks will be docked significantly.

Steelers linebacker James Harrison has been fined $75,000 for a hit on Browns receiver Mohamed Massaquoi, while Falcons cornerback Dunta Robinson has been fined $50,000 for hitting DeSean Jackson.

That's $175,000 in fines for three players, for one afternoon of football.

According to Chris Mortensen of ESPN, Harrison's fine was the biggest because he's a repeat offender.

(emphasis mine)

edit: Dodens, I get what you're saying, but these guys are professional football players. There's absolutely no reason to ever hit someone above their chest, EVER, unless it's a fluke accident. It's not much of a coincidence when the same people get tagged for the same shit over and over again.
 
It's football. Every d man wants to hurt the ball carrier.
I applaud harrison for saying that.
You smash a receiver and he'll think twice about catching the ball over the middle for the rest of the game.
The Atlanta dude that smashed Jackson was awesome. Keep your head up fuckers!


Where it's a violent game, there a line between tackling and dirty playing. That was dirty playing or what I say aka Rodney Harrison playing.
 
Haha, what a bitch.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000...nt-after-75k-fine-for-hit?module=HP_headlines

James Harrison believes the NFL's crackdown on dangerous hits is cramping his style. And, unless Pittsburgh Steelers coach Mike Tomlin can convince him otherwise, the 32-year-old linebacker claimed Tuesday night that he might consider retirement.

Hours after the league fined him $75,000 for his concussion-causing hit on Cleveland Browns wide receiver Mohamed Massaquoi, Harrison appeared on Fox Sports Radio's "Into The Night with Tony Bruno" and told guest host Jody McDonald that his first stop Wednesday morning will be in Tomlin's office.

"I'm going to sit down and have a serious conversation with my coach tomorrow and see if I can actually play by NFL rules and still be effective," Harrison said. "If not, I may have to give up playing football."

Harrison was one of three players punished Tuesday by the NFL for helmet-to-helmet hits. Hee was fined $25,000 more than New England Patriots safety Brandon Meriweather and Atlanta Falcons cornerback Dunta Robinson were because the league considered Harrison a repeat offender. He was fined $5,000 for slamming Tennessee Titans quarterback Vince Young to the turf during the Steelers' Sept. 19 victory.

Harrison, the 2008 Associated Press NFL Defensive Player of the Year and a three-time Pro Bowl pick, rammed headfirst into Massaquoi as the receiver tried to complete a catch during the second quarter. Massaquoi briefly crumpled to the turf but was soon on his feet, although he didn't return to the game.

Earlier in the game, Harrison sidelined Browns wide receiver Joshua Cribbs with a helmet-first hit that caused a concussion. The NFL said Monday that tackle was permissible because Cribbs was a runner on the Wildcat play, and that hit didn't factor into Harrison's fine. He wasn't penalized on either play.

Tomlin publicly backed Harrison on Tuesday morning before the fine was announced, saying the linebacker made "legal hits, not fineable hits." The coach also downplayed Harrison's postgame comments that he tries to hurt, not injure, opponents because it increases the Steelers' chances of winning.

"I didn't see those comments, but I know James," Tomlin said. "James says a lot of things he doesn't necessarily mean. He's a tough talker, like a lot of guys that play the game at this level. If you want to get to know James, catch him on a Tuesday when he's walking through the building with his son. He's a big softie."
Carucci: Former safety's solution
The NFL fined three players Tuesday for helmet-to-helmet hits, but former safety Rodney Harrison believes only suspensions will stop the trend, he told Vic Carucci. More ...

» Blog: NFL Network analysts' reaction
» Blog: Some say Robinson's hit was legal
» Watch: Debate about league's response
» Watch: Davis, Mora talk tackle technique

Now Tomlin must talk down Harrison, who sounded frustrated by a punishment that his agent, Bill Parise, called "staggering." Parise said Harrison would appeal the fine.

"I really truly hope it's something that can be done," Harrison told Fox Sports Radio. "But the way that things were being explained to me today and the reasoning for it, I don't feel I can continue to play and be effective and, like I say, not have to worry about injuring someone else or risking injury to myself."

Harrison later added that if a solution can't be reached, "I'm going to have to try and find a way that I may possibly get out of whatever agreement I agreed to with the Steelers."

That agreement is a six-year, $51.175 million contract that he signed last year and contains low base salaries in the early portion. Harrison is making $44,411.76 in base salary per game this season, so the $75,000 fine equates to nearly two checks.

Massaquoi's agent, Brian Ayrault, doesn't believe even that's enough.

"Harrison has made $20 million over the past three years, and they only fined him $75,000?" Ayrault said. "To me, that's not going to be a deterrent. The Browns are probably going to be without a starter this week. I don't think that fine is a deterrent or fair to competitive balance.
 
Is that really the way you take his comments (which do not include him saying that his "style" is being "cramped")? I actually for some deluded reason imagined that some people would actually respect the mentality behind his comments. He said that if he feels as though he can't play the way that he's accustomed to playing, and he can't be the great and effective player that he wants to be, then he might consider retiring. Is that really being a bitch? Obviously James is not the most intelligent person in the NFL, and what he says usually comes out sounding even more stupid than what he actually means. But I think the point that he's making is pretty clear, and I think the majority of players in the league would agree with him.

This is an issue that runs much deeper than I'm willing to engage in right now, but suffice it to say that there's no reason to believe the NFL is anything more than an emotionless corporate entity whose interest in player safety is relevant only insofar as it affects their own bottom line. The actions taken over the past week have been largely reactionary to public outcry, and that coupled with this being the season in which they're campaigning to extend the season, well, it's just bad for business. Or is it? Because for $54.95 you can purchase a 15x20 print of the very hit for which he was fined $75,000. Or, if that's a bit out of your price range, you can settle for a more modest 6x8 print for $15.95. Or if you'd like to have that 15-20 print canvas wrapped and have the spare coin, you can own that wonderful image in all its canvased glory for just $249.95. That's right, the very hit featured on highlight reels and Top 10s and Jacked Up segments can be on your wall if you pay the price. And eventually you can even buy a DVD of devastating hits released by the NFL on which this hit will surely be included. Or if you don't want to spend the money, you can be assured that it will be featured in tv promos for upcoming Steelers games to demonstrate how hard-hitting and manly a player James Harrison is.

This is a totally insincere way of addressing a very serious issue that shouldn't even need to be addressed. The NFL should have dealt with concussion related injuries a long time ago. They fought legislation against protecting players from head injuries for years before the science was too overwhelming to deny, and now they play the role of guardian in the public eye while at the same time providing the necessary encouragement of the very hits and impacts that cause concussions to assure that they continue by celebrating them, and this is obviously a problem that extends to all levels of sports journalism. If you want to set an example to Pop Warner kids playing the game, don't allow segments like "Jacked Up" to air or have a countdown of the 100 most devastating hits. Don't show highlights of concussion inducing hits in top 10 lists of weekly recaps. Discourage ALL potentially concussive tackling at ALL levels, from the announcers during the game to Rich Eisen's narrative over game highlights to its treatment thereafter. Recognize that the NFL is an integral cog in a system that perpetuates, and indeed values, these kinds of impacts, because they sell. When you glorify "blow up" plays, it makes players want to tackle like that to get on the highlight film, or as Rodney Harrison admitted, play dirty to get the big hits. Take the fines because they lead to a bigger contract, and if you're good enough at it, you make a name for yourself and you go to a Pro Bowl. Harrison was a product of this system that encourages these types of hits, and it's only gotten worse since he started playing (and even since he retired). When kids see Rodney Harrison's highlights on the tv, they want to play like him. When Pop Warner coaches see those same hits, they want to coach those hits, and they want to 'atta boy their players when they make those hits against other 10 year olds.

If the NFL is really serious about player safety, they need to back off of their proposed extended season, realize that they are culpable in the epidemic and accountable for righting the ship, and treat these types of hits and the types of injuries that they induce with the full weight and seriousness that it deserves in all phases, not just in public relations. When a 3 time Pro Bowl, former first team All-Pro and Defensive MVP player says that he feels like he can't play the way that he's been trained to play all his life all of a sudden feels that he can't play the way that got him those league-sanctioned accolades because of a knee-jerk reaction by the league to one weekend of football, then that says there's a problem with the way the NFL handles itself. You can't allow a player to play the way that he has his entire career while lauding his performance without penalizing him for rule violations and then expect him to be able to play a different way overnight. The NFL needs to do a much better job in so many facets of this issue, including, but not limited to: writing NFL rules that are clear and precise and free of grey area; educate players about these rules in mandatory sessions; enforce these rules consistently, and acknowledge when officials err in doing so; educate players on the true severity of head injuries that they fully understand what they are putting at risk, not only of others, but of themselves, and make this meeting mandatory and annual, and continually supply them with new information; encourage and glorify fundamental tackling; embrace the roots and history of the game while adapting it to a safer environment (if the rules of today were in place in the 70s, it would have been a much less dangerous league); not only "do not encourage", but openly discourage the widespread shifting away from sound mechanics toward highlight reel playing style (this is not helped when the league-endorsed video game features a "hit stick" function to provide a more lethal hit to the ball carrier); and yes, suspend players for egregious safety rule violations because fines truly do not work. If the NFL's sincerity is to be believed, then I feel that they need to start moving in this direction. I'm willing to accept a changed game that is more conscious of player safety, but all I see right now is a farce, a business man speaking out of both sides of his mouth.

And yes, this issue is serious to me. And no, it's not about the league fining a player on "my" team.
 
The bottom line is that the Harrison hits, the Meriweather hits, and Dunta Robinson hit caused other players injury because they were trying too goddamn hard to be badasses instead of just making the play. How often do we see players come flying in from somewhere trying to decleat another player and knocking the shit out of him and then proceed to dance around like a faggot as if he just want the lottery? That shit does not belong in the NFL, especially considering the violent nature of this sport.


All of those fines and injuries could have been prevented if the tackler wasn't being a fucking asshole and trying to kill the other guy, PERIOD. So if James Harrison wants to run his mouth about how these new player safety precausions are going to prevent him from playing "the way he's accustomed to playing," then I say he hits the bricks, along with Hines Ward who's worse than he is. It's all fun and games until one of these guys paralyzes another player for trying to act like a badass.

As for you trying to pin a lot of this on the NFL itself, I get it, but when does accountability and common sense come into play for the players? While a lot of NFL players don't seem to be the brightest individuals in the world, the majority of them are still college educated, so one would assume they can think logically about issues that they are involved in. Does the NFL really have to forcefeed "classes" and shit like that to them just so they understand that concussions are a serious issue that plagues the NFL and could jeapordize their career as well as others? These guys aren't retarded apes just running around a field smashing into eachother for the hell of it.
 
I played high school football, I was a safety. You are taught a certain way to tackle people, the "most effective" way to make sure to tackle the ball carrier. None of it involves leading with your head into their chest or jaw or whatever.



This is a perfectly clean and legal hit and is every bit as "devastating" and "violent" as some of these idiotic helmet to helmet hits people do. Just do this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Drunkard: I'm not disagreeing with your overall message. And I'm not going to comment on the Cribbs hit because I already did. If you look at the hit on Massaquoi, however, closely, that is, you'll see that he doesn't use his helmet at all on the hit, but his forearm, which is still against the rule, but much less worse. On the other hand, Massaquoi played a role in the ultimate result. When Harrison first lined up for the hit, his forearm was in line with where Massaquoi's chest is, right at the collarbone approximately. If he didn't tuck down and lower his head, it would have been a legal hit. So while (in contradiction to before, since I've looked closer at the play now) I agree that it should have been flagged and should have been fined, I'm not prepared to call it a dirty play or a result of "trying to be a badass" because he wasn't trying to aim above the shoulders, it just ended up happening that way as the result of the simultaneous response actions of both players. Bottom line is that his strike zone pre-impact was acceptable until Massaquoi reacted, but that the strike zone needs to be taught to be lower league-wide (as in the example Brad posted). There needs to be a medium, though. I don't want to see an increase of season ending leg injuries either.

The Brandon Merriweather I don't think anybody would dispute. Whether or not there was intend to injure in that action I don't know, but there were so many factors in that play that should have contributed to him doing nothing at all that that hit is inexcusable.

The Dunta Robinson hit is harder to say, especially because it was such a rapid response, bang-bang play that it's nearly impossible to prepare and position your body properly in that instance. Now, he didn't hit helmet to helmet, and he didn't initiate contact in an illegal spot either, but the impact rose up and contacted the helmet, which is equally against the rule as well, so that it was textbook a violation of the rule and perhaps should have been fined is hard to dispute, but I also wouldn't call this a dirty play either, or really even one that you can actually legislate out of existence. This play will always happen unless the game undergoes a transformation.

On the other hand, I think you have a lack of appreciation for the importance of the intimidation factor in the league, unless I'm misunderstanding you. Big hits are not only a part of the game, they're an important part of the game. The mental side of the game is just as important as the physical, and discouraging receivers from crossing over the middle of the field and quarterbacks from leading their receivers across the middle of the field is part of that mental part of the game. It has nothing necessarily to do with "being a badass" but with instilling ideas in the minds of the offensive players and breaking their wills, making them hesitant, thereby gaining a tactical advantage. So the big hits play a big role in the game. They should just be more like what Brad posted than what we've seen this past week. If the Robinson hit had been aimed lower, I would have had no issue with it. Neither would Bob Sanders.

And yes, NFL players are by and large THAT stupid that they need to have their hands held. If your priority is to make the game safer, then you need to do everything in your power to do that, and that includes treating adults like special needs children, because if you don't, they could be special needs adults by the time they're 35.
 
Drunkard: I'm not disagreeing with your overall message. And I'm not going to comment on the Cribbs hit because I already did. If you look at the hit on Massaquoi, however, closely, that is, you'll see that he doesn't use his helmet at all on the hit, but his forearm, which is still against the rule, but much less worse. On the other hand, Massaquoi played a role in the ultimate result. When Harrison first lined up for the hit, his forearm was in line with where Massaquoi's chest is, right at the collarbone approximately. If he didn't tuck down and lower his head, it would have been a legal hit. So while (in contradiction to before, since I've looked closer at the play now) I agree that it should have been flagged and should have been fined, I'm not prepared to call it a dirty play or a result of "trying to be a badass" because he wasn't trying to aim above the shoulders, it just ended up happening that way as the result of the simultaneous response actions of both players. Bottom line is that his strike zone pre-impact was acceptable until Massaquoi reacted, but that the strike zone needs to be taught to be lower league-wide (as in the example Brad posted). There needs to be a medium, though. I don't want to see an increase of season ending leg injuries either.

The Brandon Merriweather I don't think anybody would dispute. Whether or not there was intend to injure in that action I don't know, but there were so many factors in that play that should have contributed to him doing nothing at all that that hit is inexcusable.

The Dunta Robinson hit is harder to say, especially because it was such a rapid response, bang-bang play that it's nearly impossible to prepare and position your body properly in that instance. Now, he didn't hit helmet to helmet, and he didn't initiate contact in an illegal spot either, but the impact rose up and contacted the helmet, which is equally against the rule as well, so that it was textbook a violation of the rule and perhaps should have been fined is hard to dispute, but I also wouldn't call this a dirty play either, or really even one that you can actually legislate out of existence. This play will always happen unless the game undergoes a transformation.

Word.

On the other hand, I think you have a lack of appreciation for the importance of the intimidation factor in the league, unless I'm misunderstanding you. Big hits are not only a part of the game, they're an important part of the game. The mental side of the game is just as important as the physical, and discouraging receivers from crossing over the middle of the field and quarterbacks from leading their receivers across the middle of the field is part of that mental part of the game. It has nothing necessarily to do with "being a badass" but with instilling ideas in the minds of the offensive players and breaking their wills, making them hesitant, thereby gaining a tactical advantage. So the big hits play a big role in the game. They should just be more like what Brad posted than what we've seen this past week. If the Robinson hit had been aimed lower, I would have had no issue with it. Neither would Bob Sanders.

I don't think intimidation has much to do with it. Receivers know they could take a big hit by crossing the field, but just about every receiver in the league still does it. Hell, the Colts run a crossing route in just about every play. There are definitely a select few individuals who get scared, but I'd say the majority of NFL receivers aren't afraid and aren't intimidated about going over the middle, which in my mind makes those types of forearm shiver/spearing tackles more heinous.

I agree that the video Brad posted was a perfect example of an extremely violent yet legal hit that just so happened to fuck Reggie Bush up. However, the key point here is that hit didn't knock him out of the game, or the following week, or the week after that (iirc that was a playoff game in the 2006 wild card round, the year the Saints went to the NFCCG). Sure he got the wind knocked out of him or whatever, but since he was hit with basically a textbook style tackle using proper technique instead of a helmet or forearm that might possibly cause a helmet/elbow to helmet hit, he was fine. That's how people should tackle, not these cheap, prime time style hits.

And yes, NFL players are by and large THAT stupid that they need to have their hands held. If your priority is to make the game safer, then you need to do everything in your power to do that, and that includes treating adults like special needs children, because if you don't, they could be special needs adults by the time they're 35.

Fair enough.
 
The only thing I would say is that I really wouldn't mind if a physical injury is the result of a clean hit. If you get tackled in the manner that we're referencing and you just so happen to break a rib going down, that's just the hazards of the profession that you chose, and that doesn't make the hit any worse in my eyes (though certainly not better, as it might to some). The only thing I would have a problem with is if the tackler went in with the deliberate intention of knocking him out of the game or the next game, but then how can you even tell that? Only the Ravens are stupid enough to admit that they have a 'hit list'.[/cheap shot]
 
Here are a couple of articles that I found interesting from the NFL website, regarding player responses to the recent league actions:

Players fear crackdown on hits will change essence of football

* Associated Press
* Published: Oct. 20, 2010 at 08:23 p.m.
* Updated: Oct. 20, 2010 at 09:06 p.m.

NEW YORK -- Ray Lewis is worried about what's happening to his sport.

The Baltimore Ravens linebacker, who epitomizes hard hits in the NFL, fears the league is stripping away the inherent violence and "the game will be diluted very quickly."

"My opinion is play the game like that game is supposed to be played, and whatever happens happens," Lewis said Wednesday about the NFL's decision to crack down on dangerous and flagrant hits.

The NFL imposed huge fines on three players -- Pittsburgh's James Harrison, Atlanta's Dunta Robinson and New England's Brandon Meriweather -- for illegal hits last weekend, although none of those plays drew penalties on the field. The league warned that, starting with this week's games, violent conduct will be cause for suspension.

Arizona Cardinals linebacker Joey Porter was clearly perplexed by the decision.

"There's no more hitting hard. That's what our game is about. It's a gladiator sport," Porter said. "I mean, the whole excitement of people getting hit hard, big plays happening, stuff like that.

"Just watch -- the game is going to change."

Violence has always been a part of the NFL, bringing soaring television ratings and strong attendance -- along with the allure that accompanied tackles by Chuck Bednarik, Fred "The Hammer" Williamson, and Jack "The Assassin" Tatum.

The question is how much to allow.

"Physical, tough football is what people are attracted to," said Ray Anderson, the NFL's executive vice president of football operations. "Violent, unnecessary hits that put people at risk, not just for the careers but lives ... we're not subscribing to the notion fans want that."

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell told the teams that "further action is required to emphasize the importance of teaching safe and controlled techniques and of playing within the rules."

"It is incumbent on all of us to support the rules we have in place to protect players," he said.

But some players believe the league is asking for something much more difficult: complete changes in playing style -- changes that fans don't want to see.

Not surprisingly, defensive players are most critical.

"What they're trying to say -- 'We're protecting the integrity' -- no, you're not," Chicago Bears cornerback Charles Tillman said. "It's ruining the integrity. It's not even football anymore. We should just go out there and play two-hand touch Sunday if we can't make contact."

Miami Dolphins linebacker Channing Crowder said the only way of preventing helmet-to-helmet hits is to eliminate the helmet.

"If I get a chance to knock somebody out, I'm going to knock them out and take what they give me," Crowder said. "They give me a helmet, I'm going to use it."

The players are questioning how they are supposed to adhere to the heightened emphasis on avoiding dangerous hits when it goes against everything they've been taught since they first stepped on the field as kids.

"Guys have to be coached differently because we've been coached a certain way our whole lives," said Cleveland Browns linebacker Scott Fujita, a member of the executive committee of the players' union, the NFLPA. "I think people out there would be shocked at the things players hear in their meetings with their coaches and the things they are supposed to do, the way they are taught to hit people."

Many players also wanted stronger discipline for flagrant fouls to be part of their negotiations for a new collective bargaining agreement, not something unilaterally imposed six weeks into the season.

"We want to protect the players, absolutely," Fujita said. "But we need to have a longer conversation about it, and if you're going to impose sweeping changes like that and talk about suspending players, that's something that you have to address in the offseason."

Anderson argues that the way the game is played, officiated and policed will only change for the better -- and safer.

"We are not going to fundamentally change the game. We're focused on one thing, illegal hits to the head and neck area," he said. "We hope to culturally change it so players understand those head hits under existing rules should be taken out of the game. For players who can't make the adjustment on their own, they will get a lot of help from this office to make sure they don't play that way."

Officials will be instructed to have an even higher level of attention toward flagrant hits, which Anderson categorized as limited "but very high profile and damaging."

The NFL's crackdown was welcomed in the medical community.

Dr. William Bingaman, vice chairman of the Neurological Institute at the Cleveland Clinic and one of the independent doctors who examines concussed players to determine when they can return to action, sees it as a positive step.

But it's hardly a cure-all for preventing head injuries -- or any other injuries -- in the NFL, where the players are bigger and faster, and the enhanced equipment can make them foolishly gallant.

"We will never eliminate the dangers of a concussion occurring," Bingaman said, taking note that both Robinson and Jackson suffered concussions in their collision. "It's huge that we have the proper equipment and the proper training and proper tackling techniques.

"Anything that reduces a blow to the head, naturally I am in favor of that, because there is less risk and less incidents of concussions or something more serious. If you reduce helmet-to-helmet contact, it will reduce the number of concussions, but nothing they do can eliminate it."

Just as worrisome to some players, though, is limiting their ability to remain in the NFL.

"The guys who have had the knack to lay somebody out, I consider it a talent in itself," Broncos safety David Bruton said. "I feel as though these deterrents would be depriving them of the chance to showcase their abilities."

Anderson disagreed.

"We're not subscribing to the notion you want these guys out there running wild and blowing people up," he said. "Everything is on the table with regard to advancing player safety."

Copyright 2010 by The Associated Press

Steelers vow NFL's crackdown on hits won't change style

* Associated Press
* Published: Oct. 20, 2010 at 08:06 p.m.
* Updated: Oct. 20, 2010 at 08:52 p.m.

PITTSBURGH -- They're not sure how they're supposed to tackle. They're also confused about why they must change the way they've played football for years.

What the Pittsburgh Steelers aren't worried about is the NFL's stricter enforcement of dangerous hits altering their personality or physicality. Even if quarterback Ben Roethlisberger suggests the modification was made partly to make the Steelers (4-1) less competitive.

Linebacker James Harrison didn't practice Wednesday, saying he's not certain how to play defense now that the NFL plans to fine and suspend players for flagrant hits, especially to the helmet. Harrison was fined $75,000 for a punishing hit Sunday that left Cleveland Browns wide receiver Mohamed Massaquoi with a concussion.

"We all have the same concerns of what's legal and what's not legal," linebacker James Farrior said. "I don't think it's defined right now. It's a question mark for us, and we don't want to get in trouble every time we hit somebody, so it's definitely a concern."

Safety Ryan Clark knows adjustments will be required to follow NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell's decree that hits that endanger an opposing player's safety won't be tolerated. But Clark is convinced the aggressive, hit-before-you-get-hit mentality of the Steelers' defense won't change.

"We still want to play football in a physical manner. We still want to stop people from scoring touchdowns," Clark said. "We're going to try to do that. You have to change if your intention was to be dirty. If your intention was to go out here and hit people in the helmet, injure people and give people concussions, you have to change. But that's never been our intention."

The Steelers lead the NFL in total defense since coach Mike Tomlin was hired in 2007. This season, they are No. 1 in fewest points (60, or 28 fewer than any other team) and rushing yards allowed and are No. 6 in overall defense.

It's not just the Steelers' defensive players who are upset with the midseason enforcement change.

"We have a reputation of being a tough football team and we have a lot of Lombardis up there, and that doesn't make a lot of people happy," Roethlisberger said. "But you know what? It makes us happy, so we'll just try to go out and play the game of football the way we know how to play it."

What Steelers players on both sides of the ball fear is that defenders, worried about fines or penalties, will target the legs and hips -- possibly creating career-threatening lower body injuries.

Roethlisberger and backup quarterback Byron Leftwich agreed they'd rather have a concussion than a serious knee injury.

"Just to be a little woozy, I think guys would take that over never walking again," Roethlisberger said.

Clark said tacklers have no option now but to go low on hits, or what is commonly termed around the league as lowering the strike zone.

"We can't go around hitting guys in the head, they made that point and we understand that," Clark said. "Obviously they wanted to make it a big issue, with the media showing the hits over and over again. They had to make a statement, and I think they did. But where do you go from here? We don't want to see guys with blown ACLs and thigh bruises and hip replacements. It's a touchy subject. We've got to find a way to hit these guys within the rules."

The Steel Curtain defense of the 1970s was so dominant, the NFL adjusted its rules so defensive backs such as future Hall of Famer Mel Blount couldn't bump and run with receivers further than 5 yards past the line of scrimmage.

Clark believes these Steelers will adjust, too, even if he's not certain this change is necessary.

"I think the NFL is doing the right thing in trying to pay attention to those things," Clark said. "It's a dangerous sport and we understand that. I just don't know if we're going about it the right way, if levying fines and suspensions is the right way to solve that problem."

Copyright 2010 by The Associated Press