Official GMD Photo/Social Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, regardless of what he said, Susperia has no room to talk. She talks shit about people all of the time. About how "stupid" everyone is when they disagree with her, and how everyone lacks character as well. Best rule of thumb is don't talk shit if you can't take it in return.

well put, cuntface :Smug:


































edit: I take it back, it wasn't well put at all.
 
edit: Dave.. I don't even know what to say, other than that was really, really cruel of you, and I really feel like shit about myself now. I don't understand how people are able to say these things about others. I don't think I've ever put someone's looks/body down like that, in my life. Just because I'm not your type, you don't have to, or shouldn't, rip me apart for it. I really don't know what to say, other than I hope someday you will be ashamed of saying such mean things to someone who never really did anything to you. And if you knew me, you'd be ashamed for making a good person feel so horrible right now. Like most of you on here, I don't have the best self esteem out there. In fact, I used to not have much at all, I know I'm too skinny, I had an eating disorder and I've been gaining weight for the past year and i'm getting to a good weight, I will get there... i'm sorry I cant' say any more. That was really hurtful.

Well, the main reason people are able to say things like that is because they put about .001 seconds of thought into it. I realize how offensive it sounded, but you're giving the offending person a hell of a lot of credit by taking them as seriously as this. If anything, you should be amazed at the level of immaturity in the comment. It was brainless, and completely lacking in any form of significance.

I don't know if that's any help - just trying to put things in perspective.
 
Like you have any room to talk anyways. You are passing out porn links to people on a metal forum. You my friend, are a loser.

It's just entertainment, nothing more nothing less (a form of entertainment that involves masturbation but still etertainment)

Well, the main reason people are able to say things like that is because they put about .001 seconds of thought into it. I realize how offensive it sounded, but you're giving the offending person a hell of a lot of credit by taking them as seriously as this. If anything, you should be amazed at the level of immaturity in the comment. It was brainless, and completely lacking in any form of significance.

I don't know if that's any help - just trying to put things in perspective.

ya, I deleted it as soon as I possibly could
 
Well, the main reason people are able to say things like that is because they put about .001 seconds of thought into it. I realize how offensive it sounded, but you're giving the offending person a hell of a lot of credit by taking them as seriously as this. If anything, you should be amazed at the level of immaturity in the comment. It was brainless, and completely lacking in any form of significance.

I don't know if that's any help - just trying to put things in perspective.

Instinctive comments are normally the most truthful though.
 
It's just entertainment, nothing more nothing less (a form of entertainment that involves masturbation but still etertainment)



ya, I deleted it as soon as I possibly could

With all of the time you waste watching that stupid shit, and posting on this board. You could have bagged about 10 broads, assuming you aren't as big of a loser as Metal Wrath (pwned).
 
Hey coolname, you up for finishing what we started?

I do feel kinda bad about having bloated the thread with long-winded political rants that most people seem uninterested in. Maybe there's somewhere else that would be better for this?

Whoa, not sure how I missed so many pages of posts. I didn't think I was away from my computer that long. Well, whatever.

Anyway, I'll keep this brief since most of the people here aren't interested in this debate- I'm not sure why, exactly, because it's kind of a heavy subject, hypothetical as it may be. This is my entire argument in a nutshell, since I've presented my whole stance on the subject already:

My whole point is that I believe, based on lots of historical precedent and current events, the American people are capable of overthrowing the government. Yeah, it would have to be almost universally popular for it to be strong enough to take on the entire U.S. military, who would have nothing to lose. (Like you said, Vietnam, while I still think it illustrates the point, was a different animal, since the military had the option of pulling out). Again, I don't think the technology matters very much. It's a question of will power.

Anyway, the very short version is this: It is so extremely unlikely that this would ever happen that it's almost not worth considering. However, I feel that it's very important that we possess the capability to do so.
 
My whole point is that I believe, based on lots of historical precedent and current events, the American people are capable of overthrowing the government. Yeah, it would have to be almost universally popular for it to be strong enough to take on the entire U.S. military, who would have nothing to lose. (Like you said, Vietnam, while I still think it illustrates the point, was a different animal, since the military had the option of pulling out). Again, I don't think the technology matters very much. It's a question of will power.

Anyway, the very short version is this: It is so extremely unlikely that this would ever happen that it's almost not worth considering. However, I feel that it's very important that we possess the capability to do so.

Well, that's a bit easier to swallow than what I was hearing earlier today. You seemed to be claiming that the will of the people will always prevail over an oppressive, technologically-superior government. In my opinion, any dictatorship shows that this is not always the case.

I still don't see why you like to hold up Vietnam as an exemplar of the strength of the 'people'. Yeah, we weren't as passionate about the cause as the VC were, but it wasn't our country either; we had practically nothing to lose from leaving. I assumed we were talking about a civil war, where both sides actually have comparable motivation to fight, and where no one's going to be 'pulling out'. It kind of irks me that you said I don't know what I'm talking about regarding this.

To me, this whole scenario seems to come down to how how outnumbered the technologically-superior government is. What I picture in my head is the country splitting into two sides, both with ardent supporters, and one with most of the national military behind their back. In a scenario like this, the 2nd Amendment helps the less-equipped side, sure, but I think it would take a little more than proliferation of handguns and rifles to really allow a militia a fighting chance.

In the end, what I imagine we're going to realize is that one of us simply puts more faith in the power of a militia than the other does. All the trappings of this scenario, and the various examples and crap that we keep citing, are just making it more difficult to get to this inevitable conclusion.
 
In the end, what I imagine we're going to realize is that one of us simply puts more faith in the power of a militia than the other does. All the trappings of this scenario, and the various examples and crap that we keep citing, are just making it more difficult to get to this inevitable conclusion.

That sums it up perfectly. And sorry for being irksome.

edit: Is irksome even a word? It should be.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.