Official GMD Photo/Social Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Obama has been a senator for three years. Clinton for seven, and she's done jack shit. Just because they hold the position of U.S. Senators doesn't mean they are more qualified. It's a legislative job. That neans their job is voting.

Eight years as mayor of New York City, an executive position, during which time he made an incedible impact on the city, and he's less qualified than some woman who has spent her entire time in the U.S. Senate just trying to make friends for her bid on '08?

Working in DC does not automatically mean that they have more responsibilites. Your argument would make some sense if he had been mayor of Dirtville, Nebraska instead of NYC.

This is a pretty dumb argument, though, and arguing with you is pretty pointless because eventually you'll just do this:

oh
my
fucking
god
you
fucking
twat
i
will
kick
your
ass
i
have
a
machete

Yeah it is a stupid argument, because you are clearly wrong and the only thing you can do to support your stupid ass theory is try to turn it around into slamming me. You lose, now shut the fuck up.
 
I feel so bad for you, it must be so difficult co-existing with us lesser beings.

hey, heres something, diptshits. How about you don't post here if we are all so stupid. You and Necuratul can start your own board, and in order to join you have to take an I.Q. test. That way no idiots like us can join.

:Smug:


k
 
Yeah it is a stupid argument, because you are clearly wrong and the only thing you can do to support your stupid ass theory is try to turn it around into slamming me. You lose, now shut the fuck up.

What the fuck are you talking about? I'm actually not sure how to resond this since your attempt at a rebuttal has absolutley no bearing on what I actually said. All you do is say "oh yah well you are wrong so there". You have not actually attempted to support anything you have said, which leads me to believe that you just went and made some dumb statement without thinking about it, and now that I've called you on it (because you are a fucking moron and you don't actually understand what you're talking about) you have NO idea how to back yourself up, so you just come back with "you are wrong man stfu".

I don't know exactly what you're reading, but I backed myself up with facts. If you could actually back up your statement at all, I might actually respect your opinion, but you apparently lack the ability to do that.
 
The only factual things you said were:

1. Rudy was Mayor of a City. - Fact
2. Cliton and Obama are U.S. Senators for X amount of years. - Fact

Ok, so what's your point? How on earth does that support your argument stating that Rudy, A MAYOR OF A CITY, has just much credibility to be a Presidential Nominee as two US Senators. That's the debate. It's not my job to come up with your side of the argument too. If you fail to prove your side, then what the fuck else am I going to say? I mean the discussion is pretty much dead after you fail. Which means I don't have to do shit to support my side, even though it's pretty obvious. But of course you would disagree, because you are so smart right?
 
The only factual things you said were:

1. Rudy was Mayor of a City. - Fact
2. Cliton and Obama are U.S. Senators for X amount of years. - Fact

Ok, so what's your point? How on earth does that support your argument stating that Rudy, A MAYOR OF A CITY, has just much credibility to be a Presidential Nominee as two US Senators. That's the debate. It's not my job to come up with your side of the argument too. If you fail to prove your side, then what the fuck else am I going to say? I mean the discussion is pretty much dead after you fail. Which means I don't have to do shit to support my side, even though it's pretty obvious. But of course you would disagree, because you are so smart right?

You simply saying that I "fail" doesn't mean jack shit because you throw around "fail" as often than you throw around "pwned". I didn't fail to prove anything because you have, so far, done nothing to refute anything I've said. It's not your job to come up with my side for me, but it is your job to come up with your side, which you have yet to do.

As for the way you have interpreted my argument, you're either ignoring the meat of it because you just want to or because your too stupid to see it. Holding executive power in for eight years in the most populous city in the United States and transforming it from a city plauges by crime and urban decay and transforming it into the safest major city in the country (and that's not even mentioning 9/11) is a lot more responsibilty than you apparently think it is. The opposite is true for how you seem to think of Senators. How is being a Junior Senator for three or seven year even begin to compare? Holding a legislative position (for example: Senator) consists of voting and maybe sitting on committees and proposing bills. I ask you again, how does that make them more qualified to lead?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.