You would draw your arbitrary cultural lines on a map huh? Or do you need different skin colour to experience different culture?
Oh hum. OK first of all its been proven that the first few years of a childs development are the crutial mold for ones life. So if we apply this to cultural or environmental or social or economic conditions... what do we have ?
No, I would use the anthropological definitions of culture. You didn't specify anything, so I assumed you meant a child from a wealthy white family, and a child from a poor white family, both living in America. According to anthropology, cultures usually share a region (or country), language, religion and common social constructs. It is most likely that the children you speak of share these attributes.
Ok, I'm sure you're right in some sense of the word culture. But why stop there? Surely the environment someone has grown up in impacts their ability to do the test? Not to mention their genetics.
Well, I'm very intelligent. Not sure about the rest of you...
Ok, I'm sure you're right in some sense of the word culture. But why stop there? Surely the environment someone has grown up in impacts their ability to do the test?
But then why do studies of adopted children show that, by adulthood, adoptive siblings are no more similar in IQ than strangers?
According to what I have heard in Bio the only thing that really separates different races is what determines things in appearance like facial structure, pigmentation, and build.
So you're suggesting that natural selection caused the races to differ in their physical characteristics (skin pigmentation, cranio-facial morphology, musculature) but not in their mental traits (intelligence, personality, temperament)?
This is a bit odd though, seeing as most academics currently agree that genes play the more important role in the formation of an individual's intelligence and personality. So, if racial differences are the result of differences in genetics, and individual differences in intelligence and personality are due primarily to differences in genetics, then the racial differences in intelligence and personality must be at least partly down to genetic differences. This would also explain why racial differences in personality exist in new-born infants, for example.
but I know that there is a double standard. If a white person were to wear a shirt that says "proud to be white" they might be looked at like they are hitler. But if a black person wears a similar shirt, it's okay. I guess because Black people were oppressed before so people feel it's okay for them to wear such things without being racist because it's their way of uplifting themselves out of the oppression feeling THOUGH most of the black people wearing them have NEVER been oppressed in their lives. only 60-70 years ago there was segregation and still racism, and unequal laws....but some people act like they live around 200-300 years ago and were in actual slavery. which they weren't.
soo I agree with you, it's unfair.
so, you agree with me that "black" americans act differently than "white" americans (at least partially) because of genetic differences between the races affecting personality, i tried to say this earlier in the thread