BreathingShadow
Member
- Mar 12, 2005
- 540
- 1
- 18
What is it about Maynards voice that irritates you so much? I happen to think his vocals are really good, as do many others. Why do you detest him so much?
I mean, look at it this way... you're obviously a HUGE Trickster fan. And so am I. And Trickster has, of late, become an excellent vocalist. But let's be honest... back in 1997, he was pretty goddamn awful. Are you honestly going to say that '97 Garm is a better vocalist than MJK? If so... why?
I'm genuinely interested.
What is it about Maynards voice that irritates you so much? I happen to think his vocals are really good, as do many others. Why do you detest him so much?
I mean, look at it this way... you're obviously a HUGE Trickster fan. And so am I. And Trickster has, of late, become an excellent vocalist. But let's be honest... back in 1997, he was pretty goddamn awful. Are you honestly going to say that '97 Garm is a better vocalist than MJK? If so... why?
I'm genuinely interested.
Tool would definitely be a stellar rock band if they got someone who can actually sing without irritating the complete shit out of people.
It s a fantasy of mine to have Lemmy explain life to Thom 'I doesn't have any veins to slit' York in a confined room where Whiney Boy couldn't be able to escape.
The first sentence by Lemmy would be :
" You see son, I got into music to have pussy ..."
Thom : "Yeah but the pain inside is so hard, our future is doomed and I ..."
Lemmy : "STFU and Listen !!!"
im sure our dear mr. rock n roll would say those, but im also pretty sure yorke has much more intelligent things to say...which you have failed to hear or understand so far.
so your comment is lame. you're mistaking radiohead for something they are not: emo.
I actually dont despise maynards vocals. Maybe they would benefit from different vocals. I still really enjoy them though, but whats all this 'adams playing is too simple?' I just dont get that. why should it matter...