ChiefB said:
This is exactly what I'm seeing / listening presently. I must admit that I quite like Evanescence because it feels in the same ball park as Lacuna Coil and The Gathering. But is that considered nu-Metal, because from a "review" perspective one could take it as Gothic. The boundaries are a complete blur.
From my perspective, the line can be drawn based on:
1) The band's past. Did the band actually come from the underground, build a fanbase, and in some form, stay "metal"? Or is the band just an "image" band, and the latest corporate band for the masses?
I can see the musical comparisons between LC and Evanescence. But LC came from the underground and are therefore, considered metal. They've released 4 albums and "paid their dues" and "earned their stripes".
Evanescence just strikes me as cliche. They got popular off a song from a movie soundtrack with nu-metal rap in it. How am I suppose to take this band seriously? It reeks of corporate marketing.
LC and The Gathering are obviously more talented, but Evanescence just happens to be from the States.
2) How popular is the band? Granted, a band hard rock/metal band that just pops up in the mainstream will immediately be branded nu-metal, but so far I've yet to see an exception. Thenagain, I don't pay attention to what the masses buy these days.
3) Where is the band from? Obviously, nu-metal is American. I'm not sure if it has infected Europe or anywhere else. But bands in America were deliberately making nu-metal only a year ago. Now it seems they are trying to be "different" because nu-metal has run its course.