My frustration with my creative writing professor increases daily. Every class period while we're discussing and critiquing stories, he always attempts to guide the discussion along his own personal viewpoint, reflecting his ideal of what a work of fiction should be. He's very traditional in his outlook on the matter, always emphasizing the importance of staying within the confines of the "standards", not experimenting much, and whenever somebody attempts to experiment and it doesn't pan out well, he always suggests to turn it into something more traditional rather than try to help them out in doing what they actually wanted to do. For example, one student wrote a story about a teen girl who was always outcast because she was so different from everyone else, and in the end it turns out that she's an alien, and instead of helping her smooth out the rough edges of the story, he said something along the lines of "I would feel more compelled to give my full human sympathy to the character if the story was about a girl who was alienated, rather than an alien from outer space." This is the same guy who says that he can't appreciate Animal Farm because "it's not about humans." "Fiction is a human phenomenon" and all that crap. He can't get into any kind of science fiction or fantasy because "it breaks the verisimilitude."
Some of the crap he says just doesn't make sense as well. For example, another story a student wrote was about a guy who wakes up to realize that he was just in a car crash, and the story takes place in first person present with the character trying to recall what happened and attempting to get out of the vehicle. It's somewhat implied at the end that he might have died, but according to our brilliant professor, due to the fact that it's in first person present, he could not have possibly died, because "who else would have been able to chronologize the story?" Apparently a story has to be an actual, tangible document, even though by the very nature of a present tense narrative, it's physically impossible for that to be the case, but rather you're either THERE at the event while it's happening or you're actually inside the character's mind. It's not like there are not several classic works of literature in this format in which the narrator either dies or is implied to have died or that would have died before he would be able to write his story down. This actually sparked a fairly lively conversation and even got me to break my silence and speak up. Apparently I sounded pretty pissed off, which I was, because I've really been getting sick of his attempts to indoctrinate the class to think a certain way about what a story should be, and I felt compelled to speak up. One of the girls in this class is also in the class that I have after that, and she came up to me after that class and said she was really glad that I stood up to him and that a lot of people are getting tired of him.
[/end rant]