Filling your lungs with smoke is not inherently bad? How can you seriously shrug off all potential health hazards of smoking marijuana?
You could argue that, but personally I'd say filling your lungs with a few puffs of dope is a lot less harmful than breathing in car exhaust fumes or other shit that permeates in the atmosphere.
Its legality is irrelevant to me. Smoking marijuana is acting irresponsibly by the very nature of the effect that the drug has on the mind.
Um, what? That's complete bullshit. Honestly, you need to do a little more research on the chemicals stored in the brain and its affects on the body. There are all sorts of chemicals that the human body itself releases to induce some sort of altered state of mind like adrenaline, melatonin, seratonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and the list goes on. What the hell do you think is happening when you sleep man? Your body emits a chemical known as DMT or dimethyltryptamine, which is responsible for your dreams. All drugs do is trigger other chemicals in your body which causes the altered state of mind, nearly all of these occur naturally in the body. So where do you get the idea that sparking these chemicals through inhaling marijuana is irresponsible, especially when it causes no harm to the human body after the affects wear off?
Being under the influence of mind-altering substances puts yourself and others at risk. This is my main issue, though not my only problem. Just because you may sit in your room listening to music doesn't mean you're "smoking marijuana responsibly" as though there is such a thing. Likewise with alcohol in excess (which is the only thing that I specified as "in excess", by the way).
waat How does that
not mean you're smoking dope responsibly?
My main issue with cigarettes, of course, outside of the health issue, is the dependency issue. I consider all recreational drugs a crutch and something to be avoided, and the usage of drugs to be a demonstration of weakness, especially when addiction and dependency comes into play.
I agree with the cigarette issues, I hate smoking and don't think anyone should do it personally. But your opinion on recreational drugs is just mind-boggling to me. I have smoked dope before and can't say I'll never do it again. But is it a crutch to me? No. Where you make this connection is completely flooring me right now. What you're expressing right now about dependency and addiction comes in isn't an issue with drugs, it's an issue with human nature. Humans can become dependent and addicted to many more things than only drugs. To me, you come off as if you're afraid of experiencing these different drugs and their effect on the the body and brain. And you speak of weakness, there's no weakness in someone trying to explore the many avenues of altering their consciousness. What's weak is your complete close-mindedness on this issue and unwillingness to even understand the other side.
Tell me, what exactly is so bad about thinking less of a person because of what they do? Am I supposed to be strictly egalitarian and love everybody, or can I value drug usage less and an interest in learning more? It's not like I hate people who do drugs, think that they're bad people, or even think that they're incapable of being a 'better' person than I am. I just think less of them because of their drug usage/dependency/addiction. Not "less of them than of non-users", but "less of them than I would if they didn't do drugs".
The point is, in order for you to justifiably look down upon others you need to be perfect in and of yourself. You are not perfect. Perfection of any form as a human is a physical impossibility, therefore your opinion of others and their actions is null and void. There's no way you could theorize that a person who smokes marijuana or drinks alcohol once in a blue moon is in any way shape or form inferior to you.