Arnold Layne
Member
dorian gray said:^uhhhmmmm.....i dont think thats how it works, Alternative.
People always tell me to prove there is some kind of god, so why can't they prove to me there isnt one?
dorian gray said:^uhhhmmmm.....i dont think thats how it works, Alternative.
Ignorance does not constitute God, sorry.Alternative 3 said:There is no evidence of life on other planets but it has to be there, space is far to big for us to be the only life forms here. Although a little different (unless you belive von danikan) it has the same principals, there is no evidence of a god, there is still something that makes us believe. Which I choose to. Also I think people are assuming that belief doesnt take eveolution into account, just because adam and eve are false, doesnt make my belief any less.
Now God is limited to Christianity? What about every other religion's monotheistic God?Alternative 3 said:There is no evidence of life on other planets but it has to be there, space is far to big for us to be the only life forms here. Although a little different (unless you belive von danikan) it has the same principals, there is no evidence of a god, there is still something that makes us believe. Which I choose to. Also I think people are assuming that belief doesnt take eveolution into account, just because adam and eve are false, doesnt make my belief any less.
dorian gray said:theism is the belief in a god, atheism is the unbelief in a god. agnosticism means "not knowing" (gnost means "to know"). the appropriate thing for anyone to call themselves would be agnostic. to claim one is a theist or an athiest is to say, "i know/dont know there is a god". yet, it's not possible to "know" that something like god exists. his presence is not testable and verifiable. he's not open to peer-review. nothing against christians or jews or what-have-you, it's just not possible to *know* the supernatural exists.
I was not calling you ignorant. You impied that because there are things we don't understand there must be a God. (universe, complexity, variety) I meant ignorance as pertaining to not knowing about something not as a personal attack.Alternative 3 said:Calling me ignorant isnt going to achieve anything, I could call you ignorant for only sticking to what you can prove and not having faith, but i wont because that is counterproductive. You wont change my faith, and certainly some internet argument wont, I am happy with my belief and think I am far from ignorant.
I'm not referring to religions...bangadrian said:in like 99% of religions it is
So by your reasoning, I would not be ignorant if I believed there was a pink invisible bunny in my room that was omnipotent and omniscient even though I had no proof of it. By not believing in the pink bunny because there is no proof of it, you would call me ignorant?Alternative 3 said:I could call you ignorant for only sticking to what you can prove and not having faith
umdebaba said:Now melt all your opeth cds.