Black metal is faster, and less repetitive than thrash?
Are you fucking serious? This kid must be drugged up.
But this one takes the cake ...
This has got to be the dumbest thing i've read on the internet this month ... congratulations!
oh and why is it that you use so many different user names? "EducatedOpinion" ... member that one? Are you having some sort of identity crisis?
Well, if drumming is taken as setting the tempo of a song, there is no thrash song is existance that could match the speed of the drumming (and thus overall tempo) in a song like this:
Also, Black Metal is less repetitive because, as I mentioned, it has many more components that can be thrown into the mix to vary it up, such as "symphonic/orchestral, keyboard, chanting, operatic vocals, female vocals, choir effects, etc". When was the last time you ever heard any of those effects in a Thrash Metal song?
Go Google images for "Thrash Metal bands" and you'll see a bunch of guys in jeans and T-shirts. Do the same for Black Metal bands and you'll find, for example:
Do the same for "Thrash Metal album covers" and you'll mostly find a lot of wanna-be-death-metal artwork. With Black Metal you can find, for example:
http://www.bandswallpapers.com/img8091.htm
Now who could possibly in their right mind argue that Thrash has more defining and distinct imagery than Black Metal? Regardless of whether you like Black Metal imagery or not, there's no debating that it's more unique and powerful than the wanna-be-death-metal Thrash imagery.
So, yeah, Black Metal is faster, more varied, and has more definitive imagery than Thrash Metal, and I have empirical evidence to prove it, while all you have is: "wah wah boo hoo I'm right, you're wrong."
P.S. Who is "EducatedOpinion"?