You can read but you cannot comprehend anything you read. My last post provided a mock argument that was intentionally bad because I wanted it to mimic the kind of arguments you put forth. In other words, one that is entirely baseless and without a single shred of evidence. And no, I am asking you to provide something of substance that suggests that Watain compromised their artistic vision for mass commercial appeal to which you haven't provided anything of yet. Everything you've said so far has just been exaggerated nonsense built from your own desire to slander Watain, simply because you no longer like their music. In essence, you've latched onto a faulty perception of the band and you cannot admit to it.
Watain are no where near as successful or well off as you think they are, nor is any black metal band for that matter, as I've already explained. But this apparently compromised and 'accessible' rendition of the same band exists to boost album sales, you say? Over the last few years, who is honestly making serious money from album sales? And your answer is a Swedish black metal band?
You underestimate the importance of live performances, and promotion which, again, is part of the label's job and major part of the reason why any band signs to a label in the first place, not just Watain. Watain have built a solid reputation live and have toured internationally, and they've been promoted decently. But I'm sure selling a few thousand copies of each album is Watain's primary concern.
I think Watain are a good band but no by no means a favourite of mine. My primary motivation for continuing on in this debate is to expose idiocy and debunk the ignorant perceptions that people like you continue to perpetuate.