So did I. I resent people who try to portray themselves as "deep" and "liberated" by refusing to acknowledge the existence of genres. Genres make it easier to quickly describe the style of music a band makes. People who decry genres as being a symptom of a "labeling mentality" are completely missing the point of genres to begin with.I always thought genres were only useful for communicating what a band sounds like.
I do think that "gothic rock" has nothing to do with the actual gothic music genre, but that's another discussion.You don't complain that Gothic doesn't sound like music made by germanic tribesmen as well? It's just a name to communicate a certain sound (keyboards, complex structures, etc.)
yeah it's pretty muddled, i don't agree with a lot of those point's i genuinely like progressive for the songs, i don't see how people think it's wank, i've never seen it....but too each his own.
i've been listening to a lot of Andromeda lately and i think they do a really good job of having well thought out songs but awesome musicianship as well, they seem to have found a balance unlike a lot of the bands do today.
Just took in a listen, Augury is pretty damn good in my opinion. They got growling, a girl who sings like a fucking sylph, they got iron maiden moments definitely, and double bass kick rapage. Listen to the Lair of Purity, its fucking epic... nay, LEGEND(G)RY! Great acoustic work there. The opera lady fucking kills there too.
See, I don't entirely disagree with you about them being good musicians. They're fantastic musicians. It's just that their music sounds like ass to me.
And seriously, whoever said that their bass sounds like crap hit the nail right on the head.
I didn't find a single part of that song listenable. I could study it all day but would hate to have to listen to it. I'm forming a new genre...it's called death wank metal, and these guys are the pioneers. This band is just a big Youtube lesson on polyrhythms and odd time signatures, only you get to see four people doing it instead of one.
what do you think about meshuggah?
to the guy who said "progressive metal" is a retarded way to describe your music, i couldnt agree more. progressive indeed lost its meaning, now it means broken rhythm and weird chord structures, but its not really progressive is it
progressive is probably my third most hated adjective as applied to music, after "indie" and "post-anything"
i'd like to lock all the bands identifying as post-(genre) into a cage with thousands of rats
I wouldn't say Pink Floyd is happy horse shit, though.
I love Meshuggah, but they use their abilities in a musical way. Most of their stuff is in 4/4 anyway. They're not showing off, they're just doing their own thing. There is no other band like Meshuggah, but there are thousands of bands like Augury.
Most of Meshuggah's stuff is in 4/4? Are we talking about the same band?
yeah, maybe even ALL of their stuff, but im not too sure about that. its just odd time that adds up to 4/4 in the end, usually with a steady 1 2 *3* 4 china/hi-hat and snare thing keeping 4/4 groove.
so u get what im saying, some examples
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aMng-SNtkk
stengah first riff - 11/8 reapeating 5 times, completing itself with another 9/8 to close 64/8 total and then starting over
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6VerKdcrOQ
straws pulled at random first riff, much simpler u hear it as 7 + 7 and then + 2 to get 16
so pretty much all their shit is built around this kind of thing, get an odd time riff and after a few bars complete it to 4/4
id like to add saying meshuggah plays on 4/4 is pretty much wankery. true, u count them as 4/4 but never hear or play them that way except some rare riffs like sane, suffer in truth, beginning of future breed machine etc