Erik said:i mean really, you can't understand why ice crystals look the way they do, but you think you're in any position to discuss GOD? does anyone else see the fucking irony at work here
abso-fuckin'-lutely, people are so obsessed with what goes on after they'll be dead they don't focus on WHAT'S GOING ON RIGHT IN FRONT OF THEM. i think this is a lot of the problem with humanity. i firmly believe that when all of us die, if there is some kind of consciousness after death, we will LAUGH at how utterly insignificant our perception of reality was as mortals. and if there isn't an afterlife, then what the fuckin' hell are we doing wasting our precious time worrying about how the big imaginary man in the sky will think about us beating off?Erik said:why the fuck should we?* why does anyone need to know these things for certain? it pisses me off how people can't accept that things are as they are and live their fucking lives because believe me you will lie under 6 feet of moist earth in 80 years and knowing why snowflakes all are unique isn't going to help much at that point.
it is absolutely fucking horribly ignorant to think that our tiny, useless brains are the be all end all of intelligence, that we can and should know everything, and that if a "GOD", universal consciousness or other divine power existed we even could BEGIN to comprehend its essence. just fucking LEAVE IT ALONE. these things are not for the human brain to meddle with.
cthulufhtagn said:abso-fuckin'-lutely, people are so obsessed with what goes on after they'll be dead they don't focus on WHAT'S GOING ON RIGHT IN FRONT OF THEM. i think this is a lot of the problem with humanity. i firmly believe that when all of us die, if there is some kind of consciousness after death, we will LAUGH at how utterly insignificant our perception of reality was as mortals. and if there isn't an afterlife, then what the fuckin' hell are we doing wasting our precious time worrying about how the big imaginary man in the sky will think about us beating off?
Rensei said:Boards of Canada rules! I want their new album.
E-bortion said:I think it's short-sighted to not consider what awaits, but agreed. One sholdn't waste their life on the possibility of an afterlife. Death is beyond the construct of our logic, so for the most part, it's trivial to question.
Iconoclastic Tendencies said:yeah, but if theres an afterlife and you were a GOOD person. I honestly feel that if there is some kind of god-type-figure, it's not so vain as to go "OMFG YOU DIDN"T WASTE YOUR TIME ON A WOODEN BENCH 4 HOURS A WEEK"
so I'll live my life my way, and whatever comes, comes.
MajestikMøøse said:I used to be like NoLordy and shun even agnostics but then I smartened up, because there is no decisive proof of anything. Even all of science is merely a theory, and can come tumbling down at any moment if one of its foundations are shifted.
Erik said:i didn't say "understand", i just said "discuss". i mean, if you get to the conclusion that we can't fully understand something as trivial as a snowflake, then why even TRY to discuss whether there is a god or not? if something exists it's rather obviously beyond the limits what we can prove and observe, so why bother?
Russell said:A theory is a hypotheisis proven through experimentation/evidence. As such it's not gonna collapse - at least at a base level - ever. Other than that I'm in agreement; nothing can be proved, a fact which most people tend to forget. As such I go for the most likely explanation, which always boils down to science (and thus atheism), from my experience.
MajestikMøøse said:However, the idea of using science to postulate metaphysics will never provide a solid doctrine, since it will be constantly changing as per the whims of the scientists.