(__Joonas__)
Followed the Reaper
Seconded on every front, RR24 definitely in terms of features and build quality, if you want something more COB-ish you could shell out the extra cash for very similar Alexi-600 but you don't seem as if you're fussed about that.
I actually don't like those big arrows on the Alexi models, I prefer it pale. And of course I've read comparisons and if I get the RR24 for the same price as I would get the Alexi-600 or Jackson RR3 then of course I should get it.
I have it. It's a great guitar for it's price, sounds awesome, the floyd rose, even if it's not OMG OFR it's great and stays perfectly in tune, and you clearly love the shape and all it involves. My advice is go for it.
I'll try it today again. You have it with ebony fretboard or maple?
Wait a minute, here: http://www.thomann.de/fi/jackson_rr24m_rhoads_wh_b.htm
It's some limited run that's for 850e. What's up with this? RR24M. M for maple? Are they trying to screw me? Maple gets dirty easy. It could get all spotty like a cheetah.
They were trying to screw me because from online you can order it for 850e and get a case as bonus. Plus to the fact the guitar has been hanging on the store for some time and people have been using it. I could at least be a little business minded next time.
The RR24's have alder body, the Alexi 200 has basswood, which is heavier?
The Alexi 200 is not available in white in Finland now. I find someone selling his black Alexi 200 for 225e. I'm a little skeptic about buying used guitars.
What to do, what to do.