Guitar Player's Thread
- Thread starter Blindfold
- Start date
AlexiWildchild
Member
- Feb 19, 2007
- 325
- 0
- 16
inhe
Member
- Jun 25, 2006
- 3,723
- 23
- 38
CUMM
Pretty seksi, I was kinda hoping that there would be something extra, but maybe that changes when it's getting distributed to the public.
I never did argue that it wouldn't be heavy, I was just hoping that the riffing style would be the same as Epitaph. But I did read from the old necro board that Münzner said the riffin style would be a mix between both albums.
The fact that the jackson warrior is a rip off from an early Ibanez model called the Axstar doesn't say anything? Aesthetically, the Xiphos is alot nicer looking. From what i've heard, the Xiphos beats the Warrior soundwise, and i also think the xiphos is cheaper. So stop being a faggot yourself.
_Nazgul_
Member
Jackson WR1 > Ibanez Xip..(whatever is the model name)
Yes, you pay 3x more, but you can't beat the quality of the USA Jackson model out of custom shop
. Better, selected woods, better hardware, better fretwork .
Yes, you pay 3x more, but you can't beat the quality of the USA Jackson model out of custom shop
. Better, selected woods, better hardware, better fretwork .
the phenom
Member
^^I agree but everyone aint rich and then the ibanez will kick ass 
I think the Ibanez looks pretty cool but ill keep myself to Rhoadses and maybe buy a Jackson Dinky in the future...theyre cool!
I think the Ibanez looks pretty cool but ill keep myself to Rhoadses and maybe buy a Jackson Dinky in the future...theyre cool!
PÑoenix
Phagist Phanboy
CUMM
*Boner* Sexy as hell!! I would snap one up in an instant, if it were available and I had the cash. Absolutly stunning. I know it's only a string difference fron the other xiphos but dayum it's so kick ass.:Smokin: Jackson WR1 > Ibanez Xip..(whatever is the model name)
Yes, you pay 3x more, but you can't beat the quality of the USA Jackson model out of custom shop
But that defeats the idea of the xiphos. It's a "marshall" metal Ibanez guitar that people can afford.
Mystique1721
bass solo, take one
Not to mention this shape
beats the shit out of the warrior shape. I hate the warrior shape, it looks bent and wrong
Agreed. It looks deformed compared to the Xiphos. It's like a retarted wanna-be...even if it did come out first, haha.
inhe
Member
- Jun 25, 2006
- 3,723
- 23
- 38
Jackson WR1 > Ibanez Xip..(whatever is the model name)
Yes, you pay 3x more, but you can't beat the quality of the USA Jackson model out of custom shop
If it's good enough for someone to get the same sounds as in Only Ash Remains out of it then its good enough for me.
Mystique1721
bass solo, take one
retarTed
woops....hehe, I always make that stupid typo...here, what i mean is "retarded."
inhe
Member
- Jun 25, 2006
- 3,723
- 23
- 38
woops....hehe, I always make that stupid typo...here, what i mean is "retarded."
For some reason i tend to write that aswell, i have no idea why though.
The Emptier
t3h b3aSt0rZ
to everyone: it was my pleasure sharing that pic with you guys 
btw to everyone, jackson warriors are shit. heres the deal with jackson. they have just awesome beginner stuff, and of course AMAZING high end shit. but the middle of the road stuff is where they falter, they dont spend too much time on them. now LTD is the middle of the road for ESP (for the u.s. anyways) and that shit is way higher in quality then a jackson.
btw to everyone, jackson warriors are shit. heres the deal with jackson. they have just awesome beginner stuff, and of course AMAZING high end shit. but the middle of the road stuff is where they falter, they dont spend too much time on them. now LTD is the middle of the road for ESP (for the u.s. anyways) and that shit is way higher in quality then a jackson.
the phenom
Member
^^IMO a RR3 coud easily compare to a LTD MMV. Maybe i was just too fanboy to realise it at that time but now when i tested it...it rocked pretty much
Edit: Define quality...paintwork,wood,finishing? or playability and sound quality?
and have you had the chance to play so many medium prize jacksons that you could bash them like that? I have a rr24 and i think a Jackson dk2m snow white is really really nice still. I like my rr24 more ofcourse it being a high end guitar and all that but i dont think jacksons are that bad as you say it. Before i believe they coud have been when they just had gotten sold to fender but now they seem to regain their quality. I like both rr3 and dk2m. Nice guitars!
Edit: Define quality...paintwork,wood,finishing? or playability and sound quality?
and have you had the chance to play so many medium prize jacksons that you could bash them like that? I have a rr24 and i think a Jackson dk2m snow white is really really nice still. I like my rr24 more ofcourse it being a high end guitar and all that but i dont think jacksons are that bad as you say it. Before i believe they coud have been when they just had gotten sold to fender but now they seem to regain their quality. I like both rr3 and dk2m. Nice guitars!
the phenom
Member
