MrTagoMago
Member
- Jul 8, 2016
- 829
- 174
- 43
- 33
Even if you dont like Voivods music what i said is pretty much the truth.
Even if you dont like Voivods music what i said is pretty much the truth.
No that would be Metallica and Megadeth as well as Slayer and Anthrax. Voivod in comparison have been a much more innovative and creative group yet still manage a relitively consistent discography. While much of their work is more of an aquire taste most of their albums are of brilliant execution and quality.
So Slayer, one of if not the most influential extreme metal bands ever is not creative or innovative? I'd love to know where I can hear something like Hell Awaits before 1985.
You can shit on Metallica, Megadeth and Anthrax (lol, why even bother mentioning these?) as much as you like. Just leave Slayer out of it.
I think it's important to note in these discussions that while Voivod was very creative, they were also massively influenced by Die Kreuzen and other early post-hardcore acts. I'd say that Metallica and Slayer pioneered more techniques that helped to define metal, but that Voivod deserves props as potentially the first truly experimental metal band (although maybe Celtic Frost still has them beat slightly).
Hell Awaits is far ahead of anything on the first two Bathory albums in terms of riffing technique and composition. Seven Churches is a fair contender, but inconsistent; maybe half the songs can match up against early Slayer, the other half are basically second-rate Exodus copies. Plus, Hell Awaits was written and demoed close to a year before it was printed to record as well iirc. Early Voivod was maybe more intense, possibly even faster than early Slayer, but it was basically really sloppy post-Motorhead/Venom/Discharge stuff. There were many hardcore bands doing more or less the same thing at the same time or earlier.
I haven't heard that Paul Chain album, should check it out.
Slayer and Bathory also don't sound alike, so using Bathory's existence as an example of why Hell Awaits wasn't unique doesn't make sense.
Sure, you would still probably have death and black metal even if Slayer didn't exist, even if perhaps it took a little longer or came about a different way. Same way that the heaviest psych rock bands would have eventually created metal even if Black Sabbath died before the S/T. Doesn't change the fact that Slayer was the first to bring multiple techniques and styles of extreme metal songwriting to the table. They were a revolutionary step. Early Voivod was more iterative.
And early Bathory does have some similarities with Slayer, although it wouldn't be until BFD that Quorthon would become good enough of a musician to actually player Slayer riffs.
Not bias, objective observation. Listen to The Golden Walls of Heaven and Hell Awaits back to back and tell me you don't hear shared riffing. Or the same chord progressions between Chemical Warfare and The Return of the Darkness and Evil, the difference being that Slayer could play it much faster and tighter.
True, Slayer's creative peak was between 1983 and 1986, but that's still a long run. I'd say Voivod's was 84-89 at the most generous, more realistically limited to the three 87-89 albums, not a huge difference in duration either way. Virtually all rock bands shoot their creative loads within their first decade of existence.
He doesn't like Bathory but I do (a lot, one of my favourite bands even) and I still disagree with what you're saying. Slayer have 3 albums and an EP that easily rank among the best metal of all time, it doesn't matter that they never recaptured that brilliance again, that's more than most bands have. (And I don't personally consider Reign in Blood to be as brilliant as the first 2 albums and EP, but I'm not going to deny its influence).